Representative sample
Recent and popular public long-form videos that meet the publication quality floor.
Fear and disturbing content findings
Which YouTube creators had more scary or disturbing content?
Compare creators whose sampled videos raised fear or disturbing-content concerns, filter the results by age and channel type, and review the evidence in context.
How this list was builtSampled videos, age-specific scores, and visible evidenceView details
Fear and disturbing content score
Creators shown here scored 84 or lower for fear and disturbing content under the selected age rubric.
Full evidence remains visible
Open a creator guide for four age ranges, sampled videos, cautions, positive patterns, and limitations.
Current published assessments
Find a creator in 117 matching guides
Scores shown for ages 8–10
83/100Flamingo@flamingoFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
83/100Gloom@gloomFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
83/100ItsFunneh@itsfunnehFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
83/100Jubilee@jubileeFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
83/100Nick Fry@_nickfryFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
83/100ROCK SQUAD@therocksquadFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
83/100Yes Theory@yestheoryFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100Bionic@bionicFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100Chad Chad@thechadx2Fear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100emma chamberlain@emmachamberlainFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100FaZe Rain@trickshottingFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100Foltyn@foltynfamilyFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100LegalEagle@legaleagleFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100MagnatesMedia@magnatesmediaFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100Max the Meat Guy@maxthemeatguyFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100Ranboo@ranbooFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100Tannerites@tanneritesFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100The Slow Mo Guys@theslowmoguysFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100TommyInnit@tommyinnitFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100Unspeakable@unspeakableFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100Wengie@wengieFear and disturbing content score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedParent guide
How to review scary YouTube content without judging by a thumbnail
Horror games, true crime, fictional threats, frightening imagery, and real-world tragedy can all lower the same category score. The title or thumbnail alone rarely explains which kind of concern appeared.
Start with the selected age rubric, scan the score and sample date, then open the videos that drove the finding. A parent can use that context to distinguish playful suspense from material the family would rather avoid.
Read the score correctly
What this page can and cannot tell a parent
A lower fear and disturbing-content score means at least part of the sample may deserve a closer look. It does not mean every video is frightening, and it does not predict how a particular child will respond.
Scores can change after a refresh. Livestreams, comments, recommendations, Shorts, deleted videos, and uploads outside the sample are not covered by this collection.
See the complete sampling and scoring limitationsKeep comparing
Explore another parent question
Topic collections organize the same age-specific evidence around a narrower decision. They are starting points, not channel endorsements.