Screen Signals creator assessment

Is John Wolfe appropriate for kids?

@johnwolfe · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
81of 100

John Wolfe

For ages 8–10

A few concerns to review

The main things to review are fear and disturbing themes, and mature and sensitive topics. Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns94
Violence & intensityFew concerns96
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns96
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns95
Fear & disturbing themesA few concerns77
Mature & sensitive topicsA few concerns82
Commercial pressureA few concerns84
Positive things we found
  • Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • The video contains discussions of deception and manipulation which may be confusing for younger viewers.
  • There is some mild language and sarcastic tone that might not be suitable for very young children.
  • The content involves paranormal themes which may be unsettling to sensitive viewers.
  • Some mild casual language and informal speech typical of live streams.
  • Mentions of some horror games and movies but without graphic detail or mature themes.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video73/100

4 Random Horror Games with Scary Moms

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains mild language and casual references to death and poisoning.
  • Includes horror themes and jump scares that may be unsettling to sensitive viewers.
  • Portrays elderly characters in a potentially negative or stereotypical light.
recent · standard video98/100

Hitting 1 Million Subs Live

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild casual language and informal speech typical of live streams.
  • Mentions of some horror games and movies but without graphic detail or mature themes.
  • References to social media and internet culture that may be less relevant to younger children.
recent · standard video92/100

Debunking more BUNK viral ghost clips

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some clips involve mild scary or unsettling themes related to ghosts and haunted locations.
  • Mentions of death and paranormal activity may be unsettling to very young children.
  • Includes a commercial sponsorship segment that briefly promotes a meal delivery service.
popular · standard video76/100

The most controversial ghost hunting series on YouTube

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains mild profanity (e.g., 'hell', 'damn', 'freaking').
  • Includes themes of fear, suspense, and supernatural phenomena that may be unsettling to sensitive children.
  • Portrays paranormal claims without scientific validation, which may mislead impressionable viewers.
popular · standard video76/100

The most compelling paranormal evidence ever?

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • The video contains some mild language and casual swearing (e.g., 'bro', 'freaky', 'suckers').
  • There is some discussion of potentially frightening paranormal themes and shadowy figures, which might be unsettling for younger children.
  • The video includes a commercial sponsorship segment that interrupts the narrative flow.
popular · standard video92/100

The Conjuring House Conspiracy

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • The video contains discussions of deception and manipulation which may be confusing for younger viewers.
  • There is some mild language and sarcastic tone that might not be suitable for very young children.
  • The content involves paranormal themes which may be unsettling to sensitive viewers.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method