Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Caylus appropriate for kids?

@caylusyt · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 17, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
76of 100

Caylus

For ages 8–10

A few concerns to review

The main things to review are harassment and role modeling, and violence and intensity. Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns85
Violence & intensityA few concerns74
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns88
Substances & risky behaviorA few concerns83
Harassment & role modelingA few concerns72
Fear & disturbing themesA few concerns79
Mature & sensitive topicsA few concerns80
Commercial pressureFew concerns93
Positive things we found
  • Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Mentions of blood and intestines, though not graphically described, may be unsettling to sensitive children.
  • Some mild threatening language is used humorously (e.g., 'I'll get Reggie to punch you in the throat').
  • The game features cartoonish horror elements and suspenseful moments that might be scary for very young children.
  • Some moments include mild peril as the flood approaches, which might be slightly tense for very young children.
  • There is occasional mild frustration expressed by players when they lose or crash.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video56/100

My First HOUSE PARTY in Highschool.. (Part 2)

Score for ages 8–10 · Some concerns
  • Contains mild to moderate crude language and insults
  • Depicts stalking behavior and teacher misconduct
  • Shows underage drinking and drugging drinks at parties
recent · standard video77/100

Playing HIGHSCHOOL SIMULATOR..

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains cartoonish violence including punching and fighting among students.
  • Includes crude language and insults, though mostly mild and infrequent.
  • Features a mission involving stealing a girl's underwear, which may be inappropriate for children.
recent · standard video92/100

Testing Cars VS Huge Flood..

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some moments include mild peril as the flood approaches, which might be slightly tense for very young children.
  • There is occasional mild frustration expressed by players when they lose or crash.
  • The game includes some chaotic moments with vehicle crashes and falls, but these are cartoonish and non-graphic.
popular · standard video93/100

The New GARTEN of BANBAN Update Is TERRIFYING..

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Mentions of blood and intestines, though not graphically described, may be unsettling to sensitive children.
  • Some mild threatening language is used humorously (e.g., 'I'll get Reggie to punch you in the throat').
  • The game features cartoonish horror elements and suspenseful moments that might be scary for very young children.
popular · standard video66/100

I Survived 200 DAYS in a Zombie Apocalypse in GTA 5..

Score for ages 8–10 · Some concerns
  • Contains simulated violence against zombies and hostile humans.
  • Includes mild language and some frustration expressed by the player.
  • Features tense situations with potential character death and loss.
popular · standard video76/100

THAT'S NOT MY MOM..

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Some moments include mild suspense and jump scares that might be unsettling for very young children.
  • The game involves themes of supernatural anomalies and a possibly deceased mother, which could be mildly disturbing.
  • The video encourages observation skills and memory through gameplay.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method