Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Coyote Peterson appropriate for kids?

@coyotepeterson · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 21, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
81of 100

Coyote Peterson

For ages 8–10

A few concerns to review

The main things to review are violence and intensity, and fear and disturbing themes. Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns96
Violence & intensityA few concerns77
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns94
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns86
Fear & disturbing themesA few concerns77
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns100
Commercial pressureFew concerns97
Positive things we found
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Cold water exposure shown but no unsafe behavior encouraged.
  • Some suspense and mild tension during the search process.
  • Some use of technical jargon that may require adult explanation for younger children
  • Brief mention of use of heavy machinery and tools, but no graphic content
  • Depicts self-inflicted intense pain which might encourage risky behavior if imitated
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video96/100

Catching Massive Salamanders! (2 feet long)

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Cold water exposure shown but no unsafe behavior encouraged.
  • Some suspense and mild tension during the search process.
  • Educational content about a rare and threatened amphibian species.
recent · standard video100/100

A Custom Backyard Pond For Nubbly The Snapper!

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some use of technical jargon that may require adult explanation for younger children
  • Brief mention of use of heavy machinery and tools, but no graphic content
  • Educational content about pond building and aquatic ecosystems
recent · standard video76/100

Don't Drink This Smoothie! – Poison ivy Experiment

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • The video shows deliberate self-exposure to a harmful plant, which could encourage risky behavior if imitated.
  • There is visible skin irritation and discussion of painful rash symptoms, which might be disturbing to sensitive viewers.
  • The experiment involves handling and applying toxic plant oils directly to skin, which is a health risk.
popular · standard video78/100

Don’t Use This Plant as Toilet Paper (OUCH!)

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Depicts self-inflicted intense pain which might encourage risky behavior if imitated
  • Contains vivid descriptions of severe pain and physical discomfort
  • Mentions other dangerous insects and plants which might be unsettling
popular · standard video76/100

Japan's Deadliest Insect = Coyote's Worst Sting?

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Depicts a person experiencing intense pain and distress from an insect sting.
  • Contains graphic descriptions of swelling, pain, and physical reactions to the sting.
  • May cause fear or discomfort in sensitive viewers due to the depiction of injury and distress.
popular · standard video66/100

Testing Costa Rica's Most Painful Caterpillar Sting

Score for ages 8–10 · Some concerns
  • Depicts intentional self-harm by provoking a painful insect sting, which may be imitable by children.
  • Describes and shows intense pain and physical distress that could be disturbing to sensitive viewers.
  • Contains some mild expletive language (censored) and expressions of discomfort.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method