Age-specific YouTube parent guides

YouTube channels for kids ages 5–7

Compare YouTube channel age ratings for early elementary-age children, with separate scores for language, violence, mature topics, commercial pressure, and other concerns. These are parent decision-support ratings, not a guarantee that every upload is appropriate.

What matters most?
Browse by interest
1567 published guides

Browse all creators for ages 5–7

Page 59 of 66

30/100SML@smlmoviesPopular entertainment

SML scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed30/100WatchMojo.com@watchmojoGaming

WatchMojo.com scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed30/100nickisnotgreen@nickisnotgreenPopular entertainment

nickisnotgreen scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed30/100Spill Sesh@spillseshPopular entertainment

Spill Sesh scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling.

6 videos reviewed30/100The Take@thetakeScience & education

The Take scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed30/100Vox@voxPopular entertainment

Vox scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed30/100WILD 'TIL 9@wildtil9Popular entertainment

WILD 'TIL 9 scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed30/100WILDCAT@wildcatPopular entertainment

WILDCAT scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed29/100Mogul Mail@mogulmailPopular entertainment

Mogul Mail scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed29/100penguinz0@penguinz0Popular entertainment

penguinz0 scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed29/100The Diary Of A CEO@thediaryofaceoPopular entertainment

The Diary Of A CEO scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed29/100Trin Lovell@lovelltrinPopular entertainment

Trin Lovell scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed29/100Kai Cenat@kaicenatPopular entertainment

Kai Cenat scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed29/100bald and bankrupt@baldandbankruptPopular entertainment

bald and bankrupt scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed29/100Karl Jobst@karljobstPopular entertainment

Karl Jobst scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed29/100Kings and Generals@kingsandgeneralsScience & education

Kings and Generals scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed29/100OverSimplified@oversimplifiedPopular entertainment

OverSimplified scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed28/100Lex Fridman@lexfridmanPopular entertainment

Lex Fridman scores 28 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed28/100NakeyJakey@nakeyjakeyPopular entertainment

NakeyJakey scores 28 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed28/100Papa Meat@papameatAnimation & comedy

Papa Meat scores 28 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed28/100Weird History@weirdhistoryScience & education

Weird History scores 28 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed28/100Blarg@blargPopular entertainment

Blarg scores 28 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed28/100Cody Ko@codykoPopular entertainment

Cody Ko scores 28 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed28/100History Matters@historymattersScience & education

History Matters scores 28 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed