Screen Signals creator assessment

Is nickisnotgreen appropriate for kids?

@nickisnotgreen · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

11 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

43of 100
For ages 8–10

High observed concern in the sample

nickisnotgreen scores 43 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 8-10 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageModerate observed concern66
Violence & intensityLow observed concern87
Sexual or suggestive contentMild observed concern84
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern93
Harassment & role modelingModerate observed concern57
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern86
Mature & sensitive topicsHigh observed concern39
Commercial pressureLow observed concern89
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains mild profanity and crude language (e.g., sexual references, slang).
  • Includes adult-themed jokes and innuendo that may be inappropriate for younger viewers.
  • Mentions scams and financial losses related to cryptocurrency without detailed warnings.
  • Expresses some political opinions and references real-world conflicts (Ukraine-Russia, Israel-Palestine) briefly and informally.
  • Contains frequent strong language and racial slurs, which may be inappropriate for younger viewers.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video67/100

Going Undercover At An NFT Convention

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild profanity and crude language (e.g., sexual references, slang).
  • Includes adult-themed jokes and innuendo that may be inappropriate for younger viewers.
  • Mentions scams and financial losses related to cryptocurrency without detailed warnings.
recent · standard video14/100

Twitter Spaces Are Worse Than You Think

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent strong language and racial slurs, which may be inappropriate for younger viewers.
  • Features discussions with transphobic and racist viewpoints without significant counterbalance.
  • Includes references to sexual sounds (moaning) in a non-sexual but potentially uncomfortable context.
recent · standard video87/100

How To Be A Water Influencer w/ Danny Gonzalez

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Use of mild profanity (e.g., 'fucken')
  • Casual mention of bodily functions and crude humor
  • Brief commercial sponsorship segment with a direct sales pitch
recent · standard video43/100

Is David Dobrik The Ultimate Clickbait?

Score for ages 8–10 · High observed concern in the sample
  • Contains references to sexual assault allegations and reckless behavior that may be sensitive for younger viewers.
  • Uses sarcastic and critical language that might be perceived as harsh or negative.
  • Mentions real incidents involving injury and consent issues, which could be disturbing.
recent · standard video96/100

The Billionaire Mindset w/ Jordan Adika

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Some language is casual and includes mild profanity or irreverent expressions.
  • Certain jokes or references might be confusing or misunderstood by younger viewers.
  • The video critiques but also includes some sarcastic or dismissive remarks that may require mature understanding to interpret.
popular · standard video43/100

If "Red Flags" Was A Dating Show w/ James Marriott

Score for ages 8–10 · High observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild to moderate profanity and crude humor.
  • Includes references to adult themes such as pornography and controlling behavior in relationships.
  • Some jokes and comments may be insensitive or uncomfortable for younger viewers.
popular · standard video4/100

The Worst Comedian On YouTube

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Contains descriptions of online harassment and bullying behavior.
  • Mentions offensive jokes related to race, weight, gender, and pedophilia, though not presented directly but described in the critique.
  • Includes discussion of a call to spam and harass a Discord server, highlighting toxic online behavior.
popular · standard video78/100

The Worst Influencer Reality Show w/ Dev Lemons & Ro Ramdin

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild insults and teasing among contestants.
  • Some social conflict and backstabbing typical of reality TV.
  • Casual use of mild profanity and slang.
popular · standard video76/100

Horror's Obsession With Inanimate Objects

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild language and some references to violence typical of horror films.
  • Discusses horror movie themes that may be unsettling to sensitive viewers.
  • Mentions blood and gore in the context of movie plots, though not graphically described.
popular · standard video43/100

Brendan Schaub and The Worst Comedy Special of All Time

Score for ages 8–10 · High observed concern in the sample
  • Contains repeated use of offensive language and slurs, including homophobic terms and racial stereotypes.
  • Includes jokes and commentary that trivialize sexual assault and drug addiction.
  • Features negative portrayals and jokes about family members, including wife and mother-in-law, which may be considered disrespectful or harmful.
popular · standard video22/100

Streamers Can't Stop Getting In Trouble

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Contains discussions of racism, sexism, and harassment which may be sensitive for younger viewers.
  • Includes references to offensive language and behavior by streamers.
  • Mentions doxxing and online harassment, which are mature social topics.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method