Screen Signals creator assessment

Is NakeyJakey appropriate for kids?

@nakeyjakey · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

12 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 21, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

44of 100
For ages 8–10

High observed concern in the sample

NakeyJakey scores 44 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 8-10 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageHigh observed concern40
Violence & intensityLow observed concern91
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern88
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern93
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern93
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern87
Mature & sensitive topicsMild observed concern77
Commercial pressureLow observed concern92
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains frequent mild profanity and casual strong language.
  • Includes criticism that may be perceived as harsh or negative towards Bethesda and its games.
  • Features a sponsored advertisement segment within the video.
  • Discusses game bugs, glitches, and performance issues in detail, which might be frustrating for some viewers.
  • Strong profanity throughout The video
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video76/100

Bethesda's Game Design Was Outdated a Decade Ago

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent mild profanity and casual strong language.
  • Includes criticism that may be perceived as harsh or negative towards Bethesda and its games.
  • Features a sponsored advertisement segment within the video.
recent · standard video4/100

Jakey - Not Dead Yet (Official Music Video)

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Strong profanity throughout The video
  • References to self-harm and suicide
  • Mentions of substance use (pouring out a 40)
recent · standard video53/100

Illegally Downloading Music

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Contains strong language including explicit profanity.
  • Includes mild sexual references and crude humor.
  • Mentions viruses, malware, and computer risks associated with illegal downloading.
recent · standard video53/100

Disney Channel Original Movies

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent mild to moderate profanity and adult language.
  • Includes some irreverent and sarcastic humor that may not be suitable for young children.
  • Mentions some mature themes in passing, such as autism and racism, but without graphic detail.
recent · standard video76/100

Rockstar's Game Design is Outdated

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity (e.g., 'fuck', 'shit', 'cunt')
  • Casual crude language and slang
  • Some informal and irreverent tone that may be off-putting to sensitive viewers
popular · standard video92/100

Scholastic Book Fairs

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Use of mild profanity and informal language.
  • Some irreverent and sarcastic remarks that may not be suitable for very young children.
  • Humorous and engaging storytelling about childhood experiences.
popular · standard video29/100

Crappy User Interfaces

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of strong profanity and crude language.
  • Contains mild sexual references using slang terms.
  • Some negative and harsh expressions that may be inappropriate for younger audiences.
popular · standard video53/100

Flash Games Mattered

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent mild to moderate strong language (e.g., 'fuck', 'shit').
  • Includes some irreverent humor and casual swearing that may be inappropriate for younger children.
  • Mentions video games with violent themes but only in a descriptive, non-graphic manner.
popular · standard video76/100

Crappy Voice Acting

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild profanity and casual strong language (e.g., 'fuck').
  • Includes some references to violence in video games, though not graphic or detailed.
  • Mentions killing children in a game mod context, which may be sensitive for some viewers.
popular · standard video36/100

The Power of Video Game Cheats

Score for ages 8–10 · High observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent mild to moderate profanity and casual strong language.
  • Includes some crude humor and references to adult themes in a joking manner.
  • Mentions cheating and hacking in online games with some negative social implications.
popular · standard video76/100

Crappy Water Levels

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild strong language including one use of a strong expletive.
  • Includes casual adult humor and some crude references.
  • Mentions stressful gameplay elements that might be frustrating for younger viewers.
popular · standard video83/100

Clothing in Video Games

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains some mild informal language and self-deprecating humor.
  • Mentions gambling-like mechanics (loot boxes) which may require parental guidance for younger viewers.
  • Encourages self-expression through character customization in games.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method