Screen Signals creator assessment

Is WILDCAT appropriate for kids?

@wildcat · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

38of 100
For ages 8–10

High observed concern in the sample

WILDCAT scores 38 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 8-10 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageHigh observed concern34
Violence & intensityMild observed concern76
Sexual or suggestive contentMild observed concern78
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern100
Harassment & role modelingMild observed concern82
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern96
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern95
Commercial pressureLow observed concern89
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity (censored in video)
  • Cartoonish zombie violence and shooting
  • Some crude humor and references to bodily functions
  • Occasional chaotic and loud moments that may be intense for younger viewers
  • Contains frequent mild strong language and some crude humor that may be inappropriate for younger children.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video53/100

Skribblio But Vanoss Ruins It With Dumb Custom Words

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity, including repeated use of the word 'fuck' and similar strong language.
  • Sexual references and crude jokes, including mentions of 'jizz in my pants' and other sexual innuendo.
  • One brief mention of a racial slur as a joke, with an apology and refusal to type it out.
recent · standard video4/100

Fortnite Moments That Krust on My Opponents Face

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of strong profanity and vulgar language
  • Sexual innuendo and suggestive remarks
  • Some aggressive and insulting language
recent · standard video76/100

BO3 Zombies Moments for the Mentally Challenged

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity (censored in video)
  • Cartoonish zombie violence and shooting
  • Some crude humor and references to bodily functions
popular · standard video78/100

Black Ops 2 Funny Moments in 2026

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild crude humor and some sexual references (e.g., mentions of 'anus' and 'ass').
  • Includes mild profanity and slang language.
  • Some in-game trash talk and teasing that may be inappropriate for younger children.
popular · standard video78/100

Meccha Chameleon Moments Guaranteed To Make You Laugh (1 HOUR)

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • There is occasional mild crude language and some references to bodily functions and pregnancy cravings.
  • Some jokes include mild sexual innuendo and slang terms that may be inappropriate for younger children.
  • The dialogue includes some casual insults and teasing that are typical in gaming banter but may require parental guidance.
popular · standard video78/100

Meccha Chameleon Hiding Spots That Made Hunters Go INSANE

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent mild strong language and some crude humor that may be inappropriate for younger children.
  • Some teasing and joking could be misunderstood without context, though it remains generally friendly.
  • The chaotic and fast-paced nature of the commentary might be overwhelming for very young viewers.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method