Age-specific YouTube parent guides

YouTube channels for kids ages 5–7

Compare YouTube channel age ratings for early elementary-age children, with separate scores for language, violence, mature topics, commercial pressure, and other concerns. These are parent decision-support ratings, not a guarantee that every upload is appropriate.

What matters most?
Browse by interest
1012 published guides

Less promotion for ages 5–7

Page 38 of 43

30/100nickisnotgreen@nickisnotgreenPopular entertainment

nickisnotgreen scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed30/100Spill Sesh@spillseshPopular entertainment

Spill Sesh scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling.

6 videos reviewed30/100The Take@thetakeScience & education

The Take scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed30/100Vox@voxPopular entertainment

Vox scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed30/100WILD 'TIL 9@wildtil9Popular entertainment

WILD 'TIL 9 scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed30/100WILDCAT@wildcatPopular entertainment

WILDCAT scores 30 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed29/100Mogul Mail@mogulmailPopular entertainment

Mogul Mail scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed29/100The Diary Of A CEO@thediaryofaceoPopular entertainment

The Diary Of A CEO scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed29/100Kai Cenat@kaicenatPopular entertainment

Kai Cenat scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed29/100bald and bankrupt@baldandbankruptPopular entertainment

bald and bankrupt scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed29/100Kings and Generals@kingsandgeneralsScience & education

Kings and Generals scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed28/100Lex Fridman@lexfridmanPopular entertainment

Lex Fridman scores 28 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed28/100NakeyJakey@nakeyjakeyPopular entertainment

NakeyJakey scores 28 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed28/100Weird History@weirdhistoryScience & education

Weird History scores 28 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed28/100Blarg@blargPopular entertainment

Blarg scores 28 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed28/100Cody Ko@codykoPopular entertainment

Cody Ko scores 28 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed28/100History Matters@historymattersScience & education

History Matters scores 28 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed27/100Jordan B Peterson@jordanbpetersonScience & education

Jordan B Peterson scores 27 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed27/100AugustTheDuck@augusttheduckPopular entertainment

AugustTheDuck scores 27 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed26/100Drew Binsky@drewbinskyPopular entertainment

Drew Binsky scores 26 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed26/100IGP@igpPopular entertainment

IGP scores 26 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were fear & disturbing themes and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed25/100Adin Live@adinrossPopular entertainment

Adin Live scores 25 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed25/100LenaLifts@lenaliftsPopular entertainment

LenaLifts scores 25 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed24/100cari can read@caricanreadPopular entertainment

cari can read scores 24 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed