Representative sample
Recent and popular public long-form videos that meet the publication quality floor.
Language findings for parents
Which YouTubers swear less?
Compare sampled language scores for YouTube creators, filter by age and channel type, and open the video evidence behind every parent guide.
How this list was builtSampled videos, age-specific scores, and visible evidenceView details
Language score
Creators shown here scored 85 or higher for language under the selected age rubric.
Full evidence remains visible
Open a creator guide for four age ranges, sampled videos, cautions, positive patterns, and limitations.
Current published assessments
Find a creator in 416 matching guides
Scores shown for ages 8–10
95/100DanTDM@dantdmLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100EazySpeezy@eazyspeezyLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100Emirichu@emirichuLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100Epicurious@epicuriousLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100EthosLab@ethoslabLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100EvanTubeHD@evantubeLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100EYstreem@eystreemLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100FaZe Rug@rugLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100Foltyn@foltynfamilyLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100FusionZGamer@fusionzgamerLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
95/100gameranx@gameranxtvLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100Gloom@gloomLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100GTLive@gtliveLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
95/100Guava Juice@guavajuiceLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100HopeScope@hopescopeLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100How Money Works@howmoneyworksLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100Ice Cream Sandwich@icecreamsandwichLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
95/100Insider@insiderLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100ItsFunneh@itsfunnehLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100JLaservideo@jlaservideoLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100Jordan Matter@jordanmatterLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100KIDS2KIDS@kids2kidsLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100Kindly Keyin@kindlykeyinLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
95/100KOT4Q@kot4qLanguage score for ages 8–10, based on sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedParent guide
What “doesn't swear” can and cannot mean on YouTube
Parents often use “doesn't swear” as shorthand for a broader question about language. A creator may avoid strong profanity but still include insults, crude jokes, game dialogue, guest language, or uncensored clips.
Use the filters to choose the age rubric and channel type that fit the decision. Then open the full creator guide before treating a high score as a family rule.
Read the score correctly
What this page can and cannot tell a parent
A strong language score means the sampled transcripts contained relatively few observed language concerns under the selected age rubric. It does not prove that a creator never swears, that every upload is appropriate, or that language is the only relevant concern.
Scores can change after a refresh. Livestreams, comments, recommendations, Shorts, deleted videos, and uploads outside the sample are not covered by this collection.
See the complete sampling and scoring limitationsKeep comparing
Explore another parent question
Topic collections organize the same age-specific evidence around a narrower decision. They are starting points, not channel endorsements.