YouTube creator age ratings

Find YouTube creators by age and interest

Search a channel your child already watches, or choose an age and interest to find evidence-backed parent guides. The adult parent makes the final decision.

Score shown for
What matters most?
Browse by interest
1567 published guides

Browse all creators for ages 14–17

Page 63 of 66

54/100FLAGRANT@officialflagrantPopular entertainment

FLAGRANT scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed54/100MagnatesMedia@magnatesmediaPopular entertainment

MagnatesMedia scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed54/100readwithcindy@readwithcindyPopular entertainment

readwithcindy scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content.

6 videos reviewed54/100SLOAN@sloanhooksPopular entertainment

SLOAN scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity.

6 videos reviewed54/100Bethesda Softworks@bethesdaPopular entertainment

Bethesda Softworks scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed53/100Coffeezilla@coffeezillaPopular entertainment

Coffeezilla scores 53 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed53/100Indigo Traveller@indigotravellerPopular entertainment

Indigo Traveller scores 53 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed53/100Shanspeare@shanspeareArt & making

Shanspeare scores 53 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed51/100Law&Crime Network@lawandcrimePopular entertainment

Law&Crime Network scores 51 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed44/100Bailey Sarian@baileysarianScience & education

Bailey Sarian scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100Coffeehouse Crime@coffeehousecrimePopular entertainment

Coffeehouse Crime scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100EWU Crime Storytime@ewucrimestorytimePopular entertainment

EWU Crime Storytime scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100Kennie J.D.@kenniejdPopular entertainment

Kennie J.D. scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100McNasty@mcnastyPopular entertainment

McNasty scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100Philip DeFranco@philipdefrancoPopular entertainment

Philip DeFranco scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100SpookyRice@spookyricePopular entertainment

SpookyRice scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100That Chapter@thatchapterPopular entertainment

That Chapter scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100Wendigoon@wendigoonPopular entertainment

Wendigoon scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100JiDion@jidionPopular entertainment

JiDion scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100JCS - Criminal Psychology@jcsScience & education

JCS - Criminal Psychology scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100Cut@cutPopular entertainment

Cut scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed44/100Jubilee@jubileePopular entertainment

Jubilee scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed44/100Sensitive Soci3ty@senz15Popular entertainment

Sensitive Soci3ty scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content.

6 videos reviewed44/100Jake Tran@jaketranScience & education

Jake Tran scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed