Screen Signals creator assessment

Is SLOAN appropriate for kids?

@sloanhooks · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

16of 100
For ages 8–10

Very high observed concern in the sample

SLOAN scores 16 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 8-10 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageMild observed concern84
Violence & intensityHigh observed concern37
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern87
Substances & risky behaviorMild observed concern70
Harassment & role modelingMild observed concern80
Fear & disturbing themesHigh observed concern42
Mature & sensitive topicsVery high observed concern12
Commercial pressureLow observed concern95
Positive patterns in the sample

No recurring positive pattern was recorded.

Things a parent may want to know
  • Discusses the murder of children and severe mental illness, which may be distressing to some viewers.
  • Contains speculation and conspiracy theories about individuals involved, which may be confusing or misleading.
  • Includes references to self-harm and suicide attempts, though not graphically described.
  • Mentions public and online reactions that include harsh judgments and emotional responses.
  • Contains speculative and opinionated language that may not be fully verified.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video26/100

HAYDEN PANETTIERE'S BOYFRIEND ARRESTED, SELENA GOMEZ EXPOSES HER MOM AND KRISTEN STEWART NEEDS REHAB

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Contains numerous unverified rumors and speculative allegations about individuals, which may be misleading or harmful.
  • Discusses sensitive topics such as drug use, abuse, and death in a speculative and informal manner.
  • Includes references to adult themes like infidelity, drug use, and mental health struggles without educational framing.
recent · standard video4/100

THE LINDSAY CLANCY TRIAL SECRETS: UNEXPLAINED TRIPS, SUSPICIOUS DOCTORS & PATRICK'S BIZARRE BEHAVIOR

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Discusses the murder of children and severe mental illness, which may be distressing to some viewers.
  • Contains speculation and conspiracy theories about individuals involved, which may be confusing or misleading.
  • Includes references to self-harm and suicide attempts, though not graphically described.
recent · standard video22/100

HAYDEN PANETTIERE'S DEATH REPORT IS SUSPICIOUS: HER BOYFRIENDS BIZARRE REACTION & BAG OF DRUGS FOUND

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Contains speculative and opinionated language that may not be fully verified.
  • Discusses sensitive topics such as domestic violence, addiction, and death.
  • Mentions allegations and rumors without clear evidence.
popular · standard video46/100

TAYLOR SWIFT'S WEDDING CHAOS: LENA DUNHAM'S OFFENSIVE SPEECH AND SELENA GOMEZ SAVED THE DAY BANNED

Score for ages 8–10 · High observed concern in the sample
  • Contains subjective opinions and gossip that may not be factually verified.
  • Includes some potentially disrespectful language and personal judgments about individuals.
  • Mentions a lawsuit and interpersonal conflicts that may be complex and sensitive.
popular · standard video46/100

KYLIE JENNER IS BACK TO HER OLD FACE (SHE LOOKS UNRECOGNIZABLE AND PREGNANCY RUMORS)

Score for ages 8–10 · High observed concern in the sample
  • Contains speculative and potentially offensive commentary about race and appearance.
  • Includes negative and harsh language directed at individuals and families.
  • Mentions stalking and harassment which may be distressing to some viewers.
popular · standard video4/100

I ATTENDED THE D4VD MURDER TRIAL: WITNESSES, DNA EVIDENCE, & VIDEO FOOTAGE PROVE HE KILLED CELESTE

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Contains graphic descriptions of violence and dismemberment.
  • Discusses a murder of a minor, which is a mature and sensitive topic.
  • Includes emotionally distressing content related to the victim's family and the crime scene.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method