Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Jake Tran appropriate for kids?

@jaketran · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

5 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 21, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
8of 100

Jake Tran

For ages 8–10

Serious concerns to review

The main things to review are mature and sensitive topics, and fear and disturbing themes. Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.

Medium confidence based on 5 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns95
Violence & intensitySome concerns56
Sexual or suggestive contentMany concerns31
Substances & risky behaviorA few concerns71
Harassment & role modelingSome concerns64
Fear & disturbing themesSerious concerns27
Mature & sensitive topicsSerious concerns4
Commercial pressureFew concerns87
Positive things we found
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Describes real-world killings and violent acts which may be disturbing to some viewers.
  • Mentions death and injury of civilians in bombings, which could be distressing.
  • Contains political and ideological content related to Middle Eastern conflicts that may be sensitive or controversial.
  • Contains descriptions of sexual blackmail involving minors and underage boys.
  • Discusses sensitive topics such as homosexuality, blackmail, and political purges related to sexual orientation.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video4/100

Shocking New Discoveries Inside Epstein's New York Mansion

Score for ages 8–10 · Serious concerns
  • Contains descriptions of sexual abuse and exploitation of minors.
  • Mentions surveillance and blackmail schemes involving powerful individuals.
  • Discusses mature and disturbing themes that may be unsettling for younger viewers.
recent · standard video4/100

The Profitable Business of Blackmail

Score for ages 8–10 · Serious concerns
  • Contains descriptions of sexual blackmail involving minors and underage boys.
  • Discusses sensitive topics such as homosexuality, blackmail, and political purges related to sexual orientation.
  • Mentions drug use and references to illegal activities.
recent · standard video22/100

How Israel Assassinates People

Score for ages 8–10 · Serious concerns
  • Describes real-world killings and violent acts which may be disturbing to some viewers.
  • Mentions death and injury of civilians in bombings, which could be distressing.
  • Contains political and ideological content related to Middle Eastern conflicts that may be sensitive or controversial.
popular · standard video4/100

How Diddy Almost Got Away With It (Allegedly)

Score for ages 8–10 · Serious concerns
  • Contains descriptions of sexual assault, human trafficking, and abuse involving minors.
  • Includes references to violence, drug use, and criminal behavior.
  • Mentions graphic and disturbing allegations that may be upsetting to viewers.
popular · standard video22/100

The Enslavement of the Middle Class (Documentary)

Score for ages 8–10 · Serious concerns
  • Contains a critical and somewhat conspiratorial tone about economic and political systems.
  • Uses terms like 'cogs in the machine' and 'enslavement' metaphorically but may be unsettling to some viewers.
  • Discusses economic hardship and systemic inequality which may be distressing for sensitive viewers.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method