Less swearing for ages 14–17
Page 60 of 62
44/100Wendigoon@wendigoonWendigoon scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
44/100JiDion@jidionJiDion scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
44/100JCS - Criminal Psychology@jcsJCS - Criminal Psychology scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
44/100Cut@cutCut scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
44/100Jubilee@jubileeJubilee scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
44/100Jake Tran@jaketranJake Tran scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
43/100EXPLORE WITH US@explorewithusEXPLORE WITH US scores 43 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
42/100OUTLORE with Eleanor Neale@eleanornealeOUTLORE with Eleanor Neale scores 42 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
100/100Dr. Trefor Bazett@drtreforDr. Trefor Bazett scores 100 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
100/100John Deere Kids@johndeerekidsJohn Deere Kids scores 100 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
100/100MonikaFit@monikafittMonikaFit scores 100 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern.
6 videos reviewed
100/100Magnus Carlsen@themagnuscarlsenMagnus Carlsen scores 100 out of 100 for ages 14-17. Based on this sample, the channel appears appropriate for most viewers ages 14-17. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
99/100Red Bull Motorsports@redbullmotorsportsRed Bull Motorsports showed low observed concern for ages 14-17 across 7 analyzed videos. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
99/100Andymation@andymationAndymation scores 99 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
99/100Brickspiration@brickspirationBrickspiration scores 99 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
99/100Caleb Gannon Gaming@calebgannongamingCaleb Gannon Gaming scores 99 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
99/100Golden Hoops@goldenhoopsproductionGolden Hoops scores 99 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
99/100RedFalcon@redfalcontvRedFalcon scores 99 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
99/100Fails Boss@failsbossbabyFails Boss scores 99 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
99/100FoxyMakesVideos@foxymakesvideosFoxyMakesVideos scores 99 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
98/100Erin Degan@rindotErin Degan scores 98 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
98/100SLG@slgSLG scores 98 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
98/100FailArmy@failarmyFailArmy scores 98 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
98/100Sam Sulek@sam_sulekSam Sulek scores 98 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed