ScreenSignals creator assessment

Is Sam Sulek appropriate for kids?

@sam_sulek · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public videos—not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 12, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

84of 100
For ages 8–10

Mild observed concern

Sam Sulek showed mild observed concern for ages 8-10 across 6 analyzed videos. The most notable observed areas were language and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageMild observed concern80
Violence & intensityLow observed concern96
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern100
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern93
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern100
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern100
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern95
Commercial pressureMild observed concern82
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Mentions of product codes and URLs suggest commercial promotion
  • Some informal language and slang present
  • Mild profanity is present, though infrequent and mild.
  • Some informal language and slang that may be unfamiliar to younger children.
  • Promotion of supplements which may not be suitable for all children without adult guidance.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video81/100

PSL Vitamin Shop Raw Event

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern
  • Mentions of product codes and URLs suggest commercial promotion
  • Some informal language and slang present
  • Positive social interaction at a community event
recent · standard video93/100

BTS At RAW HQ - Florida Vlog Day 2

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern
  • Mild profanity is present, though infrequent and mild.
  • Some informal language and slang that may be unfamiliar to younger children.
  • Promotion of supplements which may not be suitable for all children without adult guidance.
recent · standard video76/100

Florida Vlog Day 1

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern
  • Frequent use of mild profanity throughout The video.
  • Mentions of dietary supplements and pre-workout products without detailed health guidance.
  • Casual references to high carbohydrate intake and dieting strategies that may not suit all viewers.
popular · standard video97/100

New Gym Tour

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern
  • Contains mild informal language and casual expressions.
  • Includes promotional content and discount codes for fitness products.
  • Mentions adult content warnings in passing related to social media but not in the video itself.
popular · standard video76/100

Old School Arm Day

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern
  • Contains frequent mild strong language (e.g., 'f***').
  • Includes some references to physical discomfort and intense exertion.
  • Mentions potential for injury if not careful (e.g., ripping muscles).
popular · standard video92/100

Eat Like a Dog - Full Day of Eating

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern
  • Contains mild profanity occasionally (e.g., 'freaking', 'hell yeah', 'crap').
  • Uses informal and casual language that may not be suitable for very young children.
  • Mentions calorie deficits and dieting which may require parental guidance for younger viewers to understand health context.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method