Less promotion for ages 14–17
Page 51 of 57
The Holistic Psychologist scores 78 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewednickisnotgreen scores 77 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were harassment & role modeling and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedbald and bankrupt scores 77 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedSpill Sesh scores 77 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling.
6 videos reviewedThe Take scores 77 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedVox scores 77 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedWILD 'TIL 9 scores 77 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedBusiness Insider scores 76 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedAugustTheDuck scores 76 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedHistory Matters scores 76 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedKings and Generals scores 76 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedAdin Live scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedHollow scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedJack Edwards scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedLex Fridman scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedmadeline argy scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedSam and Colby scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were fear & disturbing themes and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedTerroriser scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedNogla scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedCole Hastings scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedLenaLifts scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedNileRed scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedSomeOrdinaryGamers scores 74 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedNetflix scores 74 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed