Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Nogla appropriate for kids?

@daithidenogla · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

11 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 18, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

30of 100
For ages 8–10

High observed concern in the sample

Nogla scores 30 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 8-10 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageVery high observed concern26
Violence & intensityMild observed concern78
Sexual or suggestive contentMild observed concern71
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern93
Harassment & role modelingModerate observed concern69
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern90
Mature & sensitive topicsMild observed concern70
Commercial pressureLow observed concern100
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Frequent use of strong profanity and crude language throughout the video.
  • Some references to drug use, including casual mentions of smoking and Adderall.
  • Use of racial terms and jokes that may be inappropriate or offensive to some viewers.
  • Occasional aggressive and hostile language among players, though mostly in a joking manner.
  • Frequent use of mild profanity throughout The video.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video4/100

Mario Party BUT For Psychos!

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of strong profanity and crude language throughout the video.
  • Some references to drug use, including casual mentions of smoking and Adderall.
  • Use of racial terms and jokes that may be inappropriate or offensive to some viewers.
recent · standard video76/100

This is PEAK Vanoss Crew Content!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild profanity throughout The video.
  • Casual references to drug use (mushrooms) in a joking context.
  • Some crude humor and mild insults that may not be suitable for younger children.
recent · standard video4/100

Dubbing over IRL Vanoss Crew Clips Was HILARIOUS!

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of strong profanity and explicit language throughout The video.
  • Presence of sexual references and crude humor that may be inappropriate for younger viewers.
  • Inclusion of offensive slurs and jokes about sensitive topics such as child grooming and real-world political conflicts.
recent · standard video53/100

Vanoss Crew Plays Shared Health In Hardcore Minecraft!

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity and crude language.
  • Joking references to suicide and self-harm in the context of game deaths.
  • Sexual innuendo and suggestive language present throughout the dialogue.
recent · standard video76/100

WE BECOME HOMER AND DESTROY EVERYONE!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild profanity and crude language.
  • Some sexual innuendo and suggestive jokes.
  • Occasional harsh insults and aggressive language among players.
popular · standard video58/100

The Vanoss Crew Plays Black Ops 2 In 2026!

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity and crude language.
  • Some racial references and potentially offensive jokes are present.
  • Immature and sometimes disrespectful banter among players.
popular · standard video76/100

The Vanoss Crew Plays The Final GTA 5 Heist! (Part 1)

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild profanity and crude language
  • References to in-game violence and criminal activities
  • Some sexual innuendo and suggestive jokes
popular · standard video4/100

I Can’t Believe This Game Even Exists!?

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent and pervasive use of strong profanity throughout The video.
  • Use of ableist slurs and offensive language targeting disabilities.
  • Joking references to suicide and self-harm, which may be sensitive or disturbing to some viewers.
popular · standard video29/100

The Vanoss Crew Play Big Walk!

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of strong profanity and offensive language, including racial slurs.
  • Jokes and references to sensitive topics such as autism and sexual content that may be inappropriate for younger viewers.
  • Casual mention of controversial real-world figures and topics without context.
popular · standard video66/100

The End Of GTA 5 Heists! (Part 3)

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent mild profanity and crude humor may be inappropriate for younger children.
  • Simulated violence including shooting and killing of characters, though non-graphic, is pervasive.
  • Some references to sexual topics and crude jokes are present.
popular · standard video76/100

GTA 5 Heist But Everything Goes Wrong (Part 2)

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mild profanity and crude humor are present throughout The video.
  • Some sexual innuendo and references to bodily functions may be inappropriate for younger children.
  • Virtual violence and criminal activities are depicted, though in a comedic and exaggerated manner.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method