Less promotion for ages 14–17
Page 48 of 57
85/100Pretty Much It@prettymuchitPretty Much It scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were language and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
85/100Sr Pelo@srpeloSr Pelo scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were fear & disturbing themes and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
85/100CoryxKenshin@coryxkenshinCoryxKenshin scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
85/1002hype@2hype2hype scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were language and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
85/100W2S@w2sW2S scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were harassment & role modeling and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
85/100ColdFusion@coldfusionColdFusion scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
85/100Fudgy@fudgyyyyFudgy scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
85/100Legundo@legundoLegundo scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100Baylen Levine@baylenlevineBaylen Levine scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100Best Ever Food Review Show@besteverfoodreviewshowBest Ever Food Review Show scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100Doctor Mike@doctormikeDoctor Mike scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100KSIClips@ksiclipsKSIClips scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100Mikaela Long@mikaelalongMikaela Long scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100RDCworld1@rdcworld1RDCworld1 scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100The Film Theorists@filmtheoryThe Film Theorists scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100The Sketch Real@thesketchrealThe Sketch Real scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100UnJaded Jade@unjadedjadeUnJaded Jade scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100Kai Cenat Live@kaicenatliveKai Cenat Live scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100National Geographic@natgeoNational Geographic scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100Eddy Burback@eddyburbackEddy Burback scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100Jean's Thoughts@jeansthoughtsJean's Thoughts scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100Kurtis Conner@kurtisconnerKurtis Conner scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100The Living Tombstone@thelivingtombstoneThe Living Tombstone scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100Hyper@hyperHyper scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed