Screen Signals creator assessment

Is 2hype appropriate for kids?

@2hype · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

8 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 18, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
50of 100

2hype

For ages 8–10

Some concerns to review

The main things to review are language, and violence and intensity. Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 8 videos reviewed
LanguageMany concerns46
Violence & intensityA few concerns74
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns86
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns87
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns97
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns100
Commercial pressureFew concerns100
Positive things we found
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.
  • Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains mild language (brief use of a mild expletive).
  • Some gaming terms and fast-paced dialogue may be confusing to younger children.
  • The video is too brief to provide meaningful educational or entertainment value.
  • Frequent strong profanity and offensive language
  • Mild virtual violence references related to gameplay
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video100/100

Tower Of Fantasy - Origin of War Season 2 - Floor 25 3:58 clear - 1700%

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Shows cooperative gameplay and teamwork
  • Casual and friendly communication
  • Focus on game strategy and progress
recent · standard video97/100

Tower Of Fantasy - Origin of War - Floor 25 4:25 clear - 1500%

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Contains mild language (brief use of a mild expletive).
  • Some gaming terms and fast-paced dialogue may be confusing to younger children.
  • Shows teamwork and communication among players.
recent · standard video100/100

Tower of Fantasy - Myriad Server - Bygone Phantasm - Floor 365 - Frost Bot

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • The video is too brief to provide meaningful educational or entertainment value.
  • The content is very minimal and does not contain any harmful or inappropriate material.
recent · standard video78/100

Black Ops 3 - Testing Guns

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains mild profanity (one instance).
  • Mentions combat and military-style conflict, which may be intense for very young children.
  • Provides insight into multiplayer shooter gameplay and team communication.
popular · standard video4/100

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Pub Stomping

Score for ages 8–10 · Serious concerns
  • Frequent strong profanity and offensive language
  • Mild virtual violence references related to gameplay
  • Hostile tone and insults
popular · standard video92/100

CODAW Final Game + Master Prestiege

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild gaming jargon that may be unfamiliar to young children
  • Casual and game-focused commentary
  • No inappropriate language detected
popular · standard video36/100

ASM 1 Testing

Score for ages 8–10 · Many concerns
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity
  • References to underage drinking and alcohol consumption
  • Violent game context with repeated mentions of kills and combat
popular · standard video66/100

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfared

Score for ages 8–10 · Some concerns
  • Frequent references to killing and combat which may be intense for young children
  • Violence is implied through game actions though not graphically described
  • Some military jargon may be confusing for younger viewers
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method