Screen Signals creator assessment

Is 2hype appropriate for kids?

@2hype · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

8 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 18, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

50of 100
For ages 8–10

Moderate observed concern in the sample

2hype scores 50 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 8-10 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were language and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageHigh observed concern46
Violence & intensityMild observed concern74
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern100
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern86
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern87
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern97
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern100
Commercial pressureLow observed concern100
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains mild language (brief use of a mild expletive).
  • Some gaming terms and fast-paced dialogue may be confusing to younger children.
  • The video is too brief to provide meaningful educational or entertainment value.
  • Frequent strong profanity and offensive language
  • Mild virtual violence references related to gameplay
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video100/100

Tower Of Fantasy - Origin of War Season 2 - Floor 25 3:58 clear - 1700%

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Shows cooperative gameplay and teamwork
  • Casual and friendly communication
  • Focus on game strategy and progress
recent · standard video97/100

Tower Of Fantasy - Origin of War - Floor 25 4:25 clear - 1500%

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild language (brief use of a mild expletive).
  • Some gaming terms and fast-paced dialogue may be confusing to younger children.
  • Shows teamwork and communication among players.
recent · standard video100/100

Tower of Fantasy - Myriad Server - Bygone Phantasm - Floor 365 - Frost Bot

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • The video is too brief to provide meaningful educational or entertainment value.
  • The content is very minimal and does not contain any harmful or inappropriate material.
recent · standard video78/100

Black Ops 3 - Testing Guns

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild profanity (one instance).
  • Mentions combat and military-style conflict, which may be intense for very young children.
  • Provides insight into multiplayer shooter gameplay and team communication.
popular · standard video4/100

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Pub Stomping

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent strong profanity and offensive language
  • Mild virtual violence references related to gameplay
  • Hostile tone and insults
popular · standard video92/100

CODAW Final Game + Master Prestiege

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Some mild gaming jargon that may be unfamiliar to young children
  • Casual and game-focused commentary
  • No inappropriate language detected
popular · standard video36/100

ASM 1 Testing

Score for ages 8–10 · High observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity
  • References to underage drinking and alcohol consumption
  • Violent game context with repeated mentions of kills and combat
popular · standard video66/100

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfared

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent references to killing and combat which may be intense for young children
  • Violence is implied through game actions though not graphically described
  • Some military jargon may be confusing for younger viewers
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method