Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Baylen Levine appropriate for kids?

@baylenlevine · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

12 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 19, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

47of 100
For ages 8–10

High observed concern in the sample

Baylen Levine scores 47 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 8-10 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageHigh observed concern43
Violence & intensityMild observed concern82
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern85
Substances & risky behaviorMild observed concern81
Harassment & role modelingMild observed concern76
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern90
Mature & sensitive topicsMild observed concern77
Commercial pressureLow observed concern95
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains mild coarse language occasionally.
  • Includes prank scenarios that might encourage disruptive behavior if imitated.
  • Mentions personal struggles and emotional vulnerability that may require parental context.
  • Some references to past behavior that involved minor public disturbances.
  • Frequent use of strong language and insults.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video76/100

i'm quitting

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild coarse language occasionally.
  • Includes prank scenarios that might encourage disruptive behavior if imitated.
  • Mentions personal struggles and emotional vulnerability that may require parental context.
recent · standard video53/100

THE COBRA KAI MOVIE PART II - A Baylen Levine Film

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of strong language and insults.
  • Depictions of bullying and physical confrontations.
  • Some aggressive and hostile dialogue.
recent · standard video78/100

Zesty Kid Tries to Roast Me!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Use of mild profanity and crude language
  • Joking references to race and gender stereotypes
  • Some teasing and mild insults
recent · standard video78/100

I Caught Him Trying to Cheat On His Wife!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mild crude language and some sexual innuendo
  • Casual references to cheating and sexual fantasies
  • Brief commercial promotion of merchandise
recent · standard video78/100

Homeless Man Tried Stealing My Credit Card!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent mild to moderate profanity and crude language.
  • Includes teasing and name-calling among friends that could be seen as harassment role modeling.
  • Portrays a brief physical altercation in a joking context.
popular · standard video36/100

THE COBRA KAI MOVIE - A Baylen Levine Film

Score for ages 8–10 · High observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of strong profanity and insults
  • Depictions of bullying and physical fights
  • Some crude humor and name-calling
popular · standard video36/100

Funniest Videos 2023!

Score for ages 8–10 · High observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity throughout the video.
  • Some sexual suggestive language and innuendo are present, though not explicit.
  • References to substance use and risky behavior occur occasionally.
popular · standard video4/100

Funniest Videos 2024!

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent strong profanity throughout The video.
  • References to substance use including vaping, alcohol, and drugs.
  • Mild simulated violence and physical comedy involving falls and roughhousing.
popular · standard video78/100

James Charles Roasted Me!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild profanity and slang
  • References to drug use (smoking Indian Kush)
  • Mild confrontational language and teasing
popular · standard video76/100

Crazy Homeless Man Tries to Break Into My House!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains multiple instances of mild profanity and crude language.
  • Includes a prank scenario involving a person acting threatening and trying to break into a house, which might be scary for younger children.
  • Some references to alcohol or substances are implied but not explicit.
popular · standard video78/100

Catching Racist Old Man at Walmart!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity and crude language.
  • Some disrespectful language and mild insults directed at others.
  • References to partying, minor rebellious behavior, and casual disrespect towards authority.
popular · standard video78/100

Frat Boy Tried to Fight Me!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mild profanity and crude language used repeatedly
  • References to alcohol consumption and partying
  • Some teasing and name-calling that could be seen as mild harassment
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method