Less scary content for ages 14–17
Page 47 of 61
92/100Johnnie Guilbert@johnnieguilbertJohnnie Guilbert scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
92/100JxmyHighroller@jxmyhighrollerJxmyHighroller scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
92/100MeganPlays@meganplaysMeganPlays scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
92/100NicoBlox@nicobloxNicoBlox scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
92/100Piemations@piemationsPiemations scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
92/100TurboToyTime@turbotoytimeTurboToyTime scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
92/100WWE@wweWWE scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
92/100Baby Shark - Pinkfong Kids’ Songs & Stories@pinkfongBaby Shark - Pinkfong Kids’ Songs & Stories scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
92/100Crunchyroll Dubs@crunchyrolldubsCrunchyroll Dubs scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and mature & sensitive topics.
7 videos reviewed
91/100Colin and Samir@colinandsamirColin and Samir scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100Jaclyn Hill@jaclynhill1Jaclyn Hill scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100James Charles@jamescharlesJames Charles scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure and language. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100larry@larryreadslarry scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100Niko Omilana@nikoNiko Omilana scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100PrestonGamez@prestongamezPrestonGamez scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100RawBeautyKristi@rawbeautykristiRawBeautyKristi scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100ROCK SQUAD@therocksquadROCK SQUAD scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100RTGame@rtgameRTGame scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100Valkyrae@valkyraeValkyrae scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100FaZe Banks@bankshasbankFaZe Banks scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100Universal Pictures@universalpicturesUniversal Pictures scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100Airrack@airrackAirrack scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
91/100Caroline Winkler@caroline_winklerCaroline Winkler scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
91/100City Beautiful@citybeautifulCity Beautiful scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed