Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Piemations appropriate for kids?

@piemations · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
65of 100

Piemations

For ages 8–10

Some concerns to review

The main things to review are language, and violence and intensity. Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageSome concerns61
Violence & intensityA few concerns81
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns97
Harassment & role modelingA few concerns83
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns91
Mature & sensitive topicsA few concerns83
Commercial pressureFew concerns91
Positive things we found
  • Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appeared more than once.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains one mild expletive that is bleeped out, indicating mild language.
  • Some perilous situations such as characters being trapped or crushed, but portrayed in a non-graphic, cartoonish manner.
  • References to violence are fantasy-based and not graphic, but include threats and simulated pain.
  • Mild profanity including one use of a strong expletive
  • Some crude humor and references that may be inappropriate for younger children
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video78/100

HOW TO BE COOL - SKATE F4ST

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mild profanity is present, though partially censored
  • Depiction of a character experiencing pain from a skateboarding accident
  • Some references to risky behavior (skateboarding on stairs) though shown with consequences
recent · standard video53/100

Suction Cup Man 5: Rise and Grind

Score for ages 8–10 · Some concerns
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate strong language including profanity with some censoring.
  • Some crude humor and workplace conflict that may be intense for younger viewers.
  • Themes of job stress, firing, and corporate politics may be complex for young children.
recent · standard video58/100

5 AM at Freddy's: The Prequel - REBUILT

Score for ages 8–10 · Some concerns
  • Use of strong language including profanity
  • Mild threats and aggressive dialogue among characters
  • Some chaotic and potentially confusing scenes
popular · standard video76/100

5 AM at Freddy's: SUPERSTAR Edition

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mild profanity including one use of a strong expletive
  • Some crude humor and references that may be inappropriate for younger children
  • Mild scary moments with tense music and chase scenes
popular · standard video92/100

5 AM at Freddy's: RUINED Edition

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Contains one mild expletive that is bleeped out, indicating mild language.
  • Some perilous situations such as characters being trapped or crushed, but portrayed in a non-graphic, cartoonish manner.
  • References to violence are fantasy-based and not graphic, but include threats and simulated pain.
popular · standard video78/100

Sonic Frontiers of Pain

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Moderate use of strong language including profanity.
  • Fantasy violence with characters attacking each other and Sonic expressing pain and terror.
  • Some hostile and aggressive dialogue, including insults and threats.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method