Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Piemations appropriate for kids?

@piemations · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

65of 100
For ages 8–10

Moderate observed concern in the sample

Piemations scores 65 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 8-10 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were language and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageModerate observed concern61
Violence & intensityMild observed concern81
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern100
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern97
Harassment & role modelingMild observed concern83
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern91
Mature & sensitive topicsMild observed concern83
Commercial pressureLow observed concern91
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains one mild expletive that is bleeped out, indicating mild language.
  • Some perilous situations such as characters being trapped or crushed, but portrayed in a non-graphic, cartoonish manner.
  • References to violence are fantasy-based and not graphic, but include threats and simulated pain.
  • Mild profanity including one use of a strong expletive
  • Some crude humor and references that may be inappropriate for younger children
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video78/100

HOW TO BE COOL - SKATE F4ST

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mild profanity is present, though partially censored
  • Depiction of a character experiencing pain from a skateboarding accident
  • Some references to risky behavior (skateboarding on stairs) though shown with consequences
recent · standard video53/100

Suction Cup Man 5: Rise and Grind

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate strong language including profanity with some censoring.
  • Some crude humor and workplace conflict that may be intense for younger viewers.
  • Themes of job stress, firing, and corporate politics may be complex for young children.
recent · standard video58/100

5 AM at Freddy's: The Prequel - REBUILT

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Use of strong language including profanity
  • Mild threats and aggressive dialogue among characters
  • Some chaotic and potentially confusing scenes
popular · standard video76/100

5 AM at Freddy's: SUPERSTAR Edition

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mild profanity including one use of a strong expletive
  • Some crude humor and references that may be inappropriate for younger children
  • Mild scary moments with tense music and chase scenes
popular · standard video92/100

5 AM at Freddy's: RUINED Edition

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Contains one mild expletive that is bleeped out, indicating mild language.
  • Some perilous situations such as characters being trapped or crushed, but portrayed in a non-graphic, cartoonish manner.
  • References to violence are fantasy-based and not graphic, but include threats and simulated pain.
popular · standard video78/100

Sonic Frontiers of Pain

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Moderate use of strong language including profanity.
  • Fantasy violence with characters attacking each other and Sonic expressing pain and terror.
  • Some hostile and aggressive dialogue, including insults and threats.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method