Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Johnnie Guilbert appropriate for kids?

@johnnieguilbert · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
78of 100

Johnnie Guilbert

For ages 8–10

A few concerns to review

The main things to review are commercial pressure, and language. Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageA few concerns80
Violence & intensityFew concerns100
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns88
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns90
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns100
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns89
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns87
Commercial pressureA few concerns74
Positive things we found
  • Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Frequent mild profanity is present, though censored in The video.
  • Some viewers may find the discussion and visuals of eating insects unsettling or gross.
  • The video includes promotional content for merchandise and music, which may be seen as commercial pressure.
  • Mild language and casual teasing that may not be suitable for very young children.
  • Some references to personal hygiene and body-related jokes that might require parental context.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video78/100

I Went To Hooters For The First Time Ever

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mild language including occasional mild profanity.
  • References to alcohol consumption and tasting alcoholic beverages.
  • Discussion of the restaurant's branding involving female servers in revealing uniforms, which may be sensitive for younger viewers.
recent · standard video70/100

Trying Every Item From Wienerschnitzel

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Frequent mild profanity and crude expressions are present throughout The video.
  • Some references to bodily functions and mild self-deprecating humor about health and stomach discomfort.
  • Casual mention of a deceased family member in a non-graphic, emotional context.
recent · standard video76/100

I Ate Bugs For 24 Hours

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Frequent mild profanity is present, though censored in The video.
  • Some viewers may find the discussion and visuals of eating insects unsettling or gross.
  • The video includes promotional content for merchandise and music, which may be seen as commercial pressure.
popular · standard video81/100

Remembering Oliver Tree

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • The video discusses death and a fatal accident, which may be emotionally sensitive for some viewers.
  • There is mild use of strong language (e.g., mild profanity) expressed in an emotional context.
  • The video offers a sincere and respectful tribute to a recently deceased artist, promoting appreciation of his work and character.
popular · standard video81/100

I Got PERMANENT Vampire Fangs...

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mentions of body modifications such as piercings and tattoos may not be suitable for very young children without parental guidance.
  • The video includes some mild crude language implied in a brief comment about city smells, but it is not explicit.
  • There is a commercial aspect with multiple merchandise promotions and links, which may influence younger viewers.
popular · standard video93/100

My Girlfriend Did My Makeup...with Grace Van Dien

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Mild language and casual teasing that may not be suitable for very young children.
  • Some references to personal hygiene and body-related jokes that might require parental context.
  • Occasional mild crude humor (e.g., wordplay on 'labia' and 'labial folds').
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method