Browse all creators for ages 14–17
Page 67 of 68
90/100Gabzee@gabzito240pGabzee scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were language. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
89/100FlameFrags@flamefragsmcFlameFrags scores 89 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
89/100Spoke@spokeishereSpoke scores 89 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
87/100Ожидание@ojidanie228Ожидание scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
85/100GRACE SHARER@gracesharerGRACE SHARER scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
85/100YMH Clips@ymhclipsYMH Clips scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100Will Tennyson@willtennysonWill Tennyson scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100ismail G@ismailgofficialismail G scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
82/100JudeHigh@judelosasso2JudeHigh scores 82 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
81/100D’Aydrian Harding@daydrianD’Aydrian Harding scores 81 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
80/100HandOfBlood@handofbloodHandOfBlood scores 80 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
79/100TheOneWhosReady@theonewhosready-828TheOneWhosReady scores 79 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
8 videos reviewed
79/100HandOfUncut@handofuncutHandOfUncut scores 79 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
77/100Канаран@kkanaranКанаран scores 77 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
77/100Mindless Self Indulgence@msivideoMindless Self Indulgence scores 77 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
76/100ChainsFR@chainsfrChainsFR scores 76 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
73/100NELK@nelkfilmzNELK scores 73 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
73/100HandOfTrash@handoftrashHandOfTrash scores 73 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
71/100BooneU@booneuniversityBooneU scores 71 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
71/100kittydog@kittydogcrystalkittydog scores 71 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
69/100Joe Bartolozzi@joebartolozziJoe Bartolozzi scores 69 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
68/100Пенёк ТВ@penektvПенёк ТВ scores 68 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were language and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
64/100Democracy Docket@democracydocketDemocracy Docket scores 64 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
54/100PowerfulJRE@joeroganPowerfulJRE scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sample includes enough age-relevant concerns that a parent should review the findings before choosing this channel for ages 14-17. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed