Screen Signals creator assessment

Is HandOfBlood appropriate for kids?

@handofblood · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed October 26, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
62of 100

HandOfBlood

For ages 8–10

Some concerns to review

The main things to review are commercial pressure, and fear and disturbing themes. Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageA few concerns77
Violence & intensityA few concerns71
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns96
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns100
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns96
Fear & disturbing themesSome concerns65
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns96
Commercial pressureSome concerns58
Positive things we found
  • Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Mild profanity and casual swearing
  • Horror themes with suspense and jump scares
  • Mentions of eye discomfort and taping eyes open, which could be concerning
  • Some mild language is present, including mild profanity.
  • The horror game setting includes mild scary moments and tension, which may be unsettling for very young children.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video77/100

Dieser Ausweis ist GEFÄLSCHT | Shift at Midnight

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains simulated violence including shooting and traps against supernatural creatures.
  • Includes some mild crude language and references to bodily functions.
  • Some tense moments with horror and suspense elements that might be unsettling for younger children.
recent · standard video81/100

Ich spiele ALLE BACKROOMS Spiele (kein clickbait)

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Some mild language is present, including mild profanity.
  • The horror game setting includes mild scary moments and tension, which may be unsettling for very young children.
  • There are brief mentions of aggressive entities in the game, but no graphic descriptions or visuals in The video.
recent · standard video46/100

Das GOTTLOSESTE Horrorgame 2026! | Psalm 2

Score for ages 8–10 · Many concerns
  • The video contains mild profanity and crude language occasionally.
  • There are references to dismembered body parts and a generally creepy, unsettling atmosphere consistent with horror games.
  • Jump scares and tense moments may be frightening for younger or sensitive viewers.
popular · standard video78/100

Das SCHLIMMSTE Spiel des Jahres? | Deadcam

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains mild profanity and some crude language.
  • Includes tense and suspenseful horror game scenarios that may be scary for younger children.
  • Some frustration and strong language expressed by the player may be off-putting to sensitive viewers.
popular · standard video46/100

Bei jedem Blinzeln, wird es schlimmer!

Score for ages 8–10 · Many concerns
  • Mild profanity and casual swearing
  • Horror themes with suspense and jump scares
  • Mentions of eye discomfort and taping eyes open, which could be concerning
popular · standard video58/100

Ich eröffne ein Testzentrum (für Zombies)

Score for ages 8–10 · Some concerns
  • The video contains frequent mild profanity and crude language that may be inappropriate for younger children.
  • There are references to violence, including executions and 'liquidation' of infected individuals, though presented in a fictional and comedic context.
  • Some dark humor about disease symptoms and death may be disturbing to sensitive viewers.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method