Less scary content for ages 14–17
Page 57 of 61
75/100IMPAULSIVE@impaulsiveIMPAULSIVE scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
75/100Jack Edwards@jack_edwardsJack Edwards scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
75/100Lex Fridman@lexfridmanLex Fridman scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
75/100madeline argy@madelineargymadeline argy scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
75/100Man Carrying Thing@mancarryingthingMan Carrying Thing scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
75/100Terroriser@terroriserTerroriser scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
75/100Nogla@daithidenoglaNogla scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
75/100Cole Hastings@colehastingsCole Hastings scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
75/100LenaLifts@lenaliftsLenaLifts scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
75/100NileRed@nileredNileRed scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
75/100TheMisterEpic@themisterepicTheMisterEpic scores 75 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
74/100FULL SEND PODCAST@fullsendpodcastFULL SEND PODCAST scores 74 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
74/100Sofia Franklyn@sofiafranklynSofia Franklyn scores 74 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
74/100Netflix@netflixNetflix scores 74 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
74/100Brad Mondo@bradmondoBrad Mondo scores 74 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
74/100HealthyGamerGG@healthygamerggHealthyGamerGG scores 74 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
74/100Kati Morton@katimortonKati Morton scores 74 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
74/100Mercury Stardust@mercury_stardustMercury Stardust scores 74 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
74/100Karuna Satori ASMR@karunasatoriasmrKaruna Satori ASMR scores 74 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
73/100Epic History@epichistorytvEpic History scores 73 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
73/100Mogul Mail@mogulmailMogul Mail scores 73 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
73/100Bad Friends@badfriendsBad Friends scores 73 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
73/100Climate Town@climatetownClimate Town scores 73 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
73/100JUST TRISH PODCAST@justtrishpodcastJUST TRISH PODCAST scores 73 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed