YouTube creator age ratings

Find YouTube creators by age and interest

Search a channel your child already watches, or choose an age and interest to find evidence-backed parent guides. The adult parent makes the final decision.

Score shown for
What matters most?
Browse by interest
1366 published guides

Less promotion for ages 14–17

Page 55 of 57

51/100Law&Crime Network@lawandcrimePopular entertainment

Law&Crime Network scores 51 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed44/100Bailey Sarian@baileysarianScience & education

Bailey Sarian scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100Coffeehouse Crime@coffeehousecrimePopular entertainment

Coffeehouse Crime scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100EWU Crime Storytime@ewucrimestorytimePopular entertainment

EWU Crime Storytime scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100Kennie J.D.@kenniejdPopular entertainment

Kennie J.D. scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100McNasty@mcnastyPopular entertainment

McNasty scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100Philip DeFranco@philipdefrancoPopular entertainment

Philip DeFranco scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100SpookyRice@spookyricePopular entertainment

SpookyRice scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100That Chapter@thatchapterPopular entertainment

That Chapter scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100Wendigoon@wendigoonPopular entertainment

Wendigoon scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100JiDion@jidionPopular entertainment

JiDion scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100JCS - Criminal Psychology@jcsScience & education

JCS - Criminal Psychology scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed44/100Cut@cutPopular entertainment

Cut scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed44/100Jubilee@jubileePopular entertainment

Jubilee scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed44/100Sensitive Soci3ty@senz15Popular entertainment

Sensitive Soci3ty scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content.

6 videos reviewed44/100Jake Tran@jaketranScience & education

Jake Tran scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed43/100EXPLORE WITH US@explorewithusPopular entertainment

EXPLORE WITH US scores 43 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed42/100OUTLORE with Eleanor Neale@eleanornealePopular entertainment

OUTLORE with Eleanor Neale scores 42 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed100/100Dr. Trefor Bazett@drtreforScience & education

Dr. Trefor Bazett scores 100 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed100/100John Deere Kids@johndeerekidsScience & education

John Deere Kids scores 100 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed100/100MonikaFit@monikafittFamily entertainment

MonikaFit scores 100 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern.

6 videos reviewed100/100Magnus Carlsen@themagnuscarlsenPopular entertainment

Magnus Carlsen scores 100 out of 100 for ages 14-17. Based on this sample, the channel appears appropriate for most viewers ages 14-17. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed99/100Red Bull Motorsports@redbullmotorsportsPopular entertainment

Red Bull Motorsports showed low observed concern for ages 14-17 across 7 analyzed videos. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed99/100Andymation@andymationAnimation & comedy

Andymation scores 99 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed