Less promotion for ages 14–17
Page 53 of 57
69/100neo@neoexplainsneo scores 69 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
69/100RealLifeLore@reallifeloreRealLifeLore scores 69 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
67/100WatchMojo.com@watchmojoWatchMojo.com scores 67 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
67/100Insider@insiderInsider scores 67 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
67/100Patrick Cc:@patrickccPatrick Cc: scores 67 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
67/100The Financial Diet@thefinancialdietThe Financial Diet scores 67 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
66/100penguinz0@penguinz0penguinz0 scores 66 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
66/100Cody Ko@codykoCody Ko scores 66 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
64/100Kurt Caz@kurtcazKurt Caz scores 64 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
64/100The Armchair Historian@thearmchairhistorianThe Armchair Historian scores 64 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
64/100How Money Works@howmoneyworksHow Money Works scores 64 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
63/100Kallmekris@kallmekrisKallmekris showed moderate observed concern for ages 14-17 across 12 analyzed videos. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was the video provides a thorough, personal account of grooming and abuse, helping viewers understand the complexity of such situations.
12 videos reviewed
63/100Timeline - World History Documentaries@timelinechannelTimeline - World History Documentaries scores 63 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
62/100Broey Deschanel@broeydeschanelBroey Deschanel scores 62 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
61/100Saji Sharma@sajisharmaSaji Sharma scores 61 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
61/100Annamarie Forcino@annamarieforcinoAnnamarie Forcino scores 61 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
60/100H3 Podcast@h3podcastH3 Podcast scores 60 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
60/100Kuncan Dastner@kuncandastnerKuncan Dastner scores 60 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
59/100Jake Doolittle@jakedoolittleJake Doolittle scores 59 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
56/100HasanAbi@hasanabiHasanAbi scores 56 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
55/100CaspianReport@caspianreportCaspianReport scores 55 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
54/100Acheeto@acheetoAcheeto scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
54/100Asmongold TV@asmontvAsmongold TV scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
54/100Brandon Rogers@brandonrogersBrandon Rogers scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were harassment & role modeling and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed