Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Brandon Rogers appropriate for kids?

@brandonrogers · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

12 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 18, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

20of 100
For ages 8–10

Very high observed concern in the sample

Brandon Rogers scores 20 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 8-10 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageVery high observed concern16
Violence & intensityModerate observed concern62
Sexual or suggestive contentHigh observed concern40
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern88
Harassment & role modelingHigh observed concern32
Fear & disturbing themesModerate observed concern64
Mature & sensitive topicsHigh observed concern30
Commercial pressureLow observed concern97
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Frequent use of strong and offensive language including slurs and profanity.
  • Multiple sexual references and innuendos, including explicit mentions of sexual acts and adult film industry.
  • References to drug and alcohol use in a party context.
  • Derogatory and ableist language used repeatedly, which is inappropriate for children and may be offensive to some adults.
  • Contains explicit and offensive language including slurs and threats.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video4/100

Dr. Phil Joins ICE

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Contains explicit and offensive language including slurs and threats.
  • Includes racial profiling and discriminatory remarks.
  • Depicts violence and aggressive behavior.
recent · standard video4/100

My Arch Rival...

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of strong and offensive language including slurs and profanity.
  • Multiple sexual references and innuendos, including explicit mentions of sexual acts and adult film industry.
  • References to drug and alcohol use in a party context.
recent · standard video78/100

Watch while eating…

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains crude humor and references to bodily functions that may be off-putting to some viewers.
  • Some mild vulgar language and insults are present.
  • The exaggerated and absurd scenarios might confuse younger children.
recent · standard video4/100

The Amazing Disabled Circus!

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of strong profanity and slurs, some directed at characters and groups.
  • Violent threats and aggressive behavior are depicted, though in a comedic and exaggerated manner.
  • Some crude humor involving bodily functions and offensive language.
recent · standard video83/100

Something's Hiding in My Garden

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild profanity (e.g., 'goddamn').
  • Includes references to addiction and family problems.
  • Features emotional distress and shouting that may be unsettling.
popular · standard video4/100

My Conjoined Kids HATE Me!

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent strong and offensive language.
  • Includes verbal abuse and emotional mistreatment of children.
  • Depicts disability in a negative and potentially harmful way.
popular · standard video4/100

A Night at the Park

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent strong profanity and crude language throughout The video.
  • Multiple references to violence including murder, assault, and threats with weapons.
  • Mature social topics including transgender identity, sexual assault accusations, and substance abuse are presented in a comedic but potentially sensitive manner.
popular · standard video4/100

Darth Gayder HATES His Kids | PRIDE SPECIAL

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent strong profanity and offensive language
  • Explicit sexual content and references to incest
  • Hostile and threatening family interactions
popular · standard video4/100

Pregnant Fight!!

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent strong profanity and vulgar language throughout.
  • Depictions of physical aggression and hostile behavior.
  • Mature themes including pregnancy, labor, and crude sexual references.
popular · standard video4/100

This MIGHT Be a Cult

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Contains explicit sexual references and crude language.
  • Depicts controlling and abusive group dynamics.
  • Includes disturbing and unsettling themes about cult behavior.
popular · standard video58/100

I know you're awake.

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of strong coarse language (censored but implied)
  • Adult themes including marital conflict, therapy, and mental health references
  • Some crude insults and aggressive tone in dialogue
popular · standard video76/100

Don’t Touch My Space Suit!!!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mild crude and profane language used repeatedly
  • Mild violence and combat references in a fantasy context
  • Some sexual innuendo and suggestive language
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method