Less scary content for ages 14–17
Page 42 of 61
94/100Gary Pilarchik (The Rusted Garden)@therustedgardenGary Pilarchik (The Rusted Garden) scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100George Mavrakis@coralfish12gGeorge Mavrakis scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Gloom@gloomGloom scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100HopeScope@hopescopeHopeScope scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Huda Beauty@hudabeautyHuda Beauty scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100IBella@ibellaIBella scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Jet Lag: The Game@jetlagthegameJet Lag: The Game scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100John Wolfe@johnwolfeJohn Wolfe scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Kaden Fumblebottom@kadenfumblebottomKaden Fumblebottom scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Karina Garcia@thekarinabearKarina Garcia scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Kenny Chao@kennychaojrKenny Chao scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100KidCity@kcityKidCity scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Kitten Lady@kittenladyKitten Lady scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100League of Legends@leagueoflegendsLeague of Legends scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Let Me Explain Studios@letmeexplainstudiosLet Me Explain Studios scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Linkus7@linkus7Linkus7 scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Logan Paul@loganpaulvlogsLogan Paul scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Mai Pham@maiphammyMai Pham scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Mark Rober@markroberMark Rober scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Merphy Napier | Manga@merphynapier42Merphy Napier | Manga scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Mia Maples@miamaplesMia Maples scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100MiniBloxia@minibloxiaMiniBloxia scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Muselk@mrmuselkMuselk scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Mythical Kitchen@mythicalkitchenMythical Kitchen scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed