YouTube creator age ratings

Find YouTube creators by age and interest

Search a channel your child already watches, or choose an age and interest to find evidence-backed parent guides. The adult parent makes the final decision.

210 published guides

Science & education for ages 14–17

Page 9 of 9

72/100James Jani@jamesjaniScience & education

James Jani scores 72 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
72/100Vsauce2@vsauce2Science & education

Vsauce2 scores 72 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
72/100Weird History@weirdhistoryScience & education

Weird History scores 72 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
71/100Explosions&Fire@explosionsandfireScience & education

Explosions&Fire scores 71 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
71/100Jordan B Peterson@jordanbpetersonScience & education

Jordan B Peterson scores 71 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
69/100neo@neoexplainsScience & education

neo scores 69 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
67/100The Financial Diet@thefinancialdietScience & education

The Financial Diet scores 67 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
64/100The Armchair Historian@thearmchairhistorianAnimation & comedyScience & education

The Armchair Historian scores 64 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
63/100Timeline - World History Documentaries@timelinechannelScience & education

Timeline - World History Documentaries scores 63 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
54/100James Welsh@jameswelshScience & education

James Welsh scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
44/100Bailey Sarian@baileysarianScience & education

Bailey Sarian scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
44/100JCS - Criminal Psychology@jcsScience & education

JCS - Criminal Psychology scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
44/100Jake Tran@jaketranScience & education

Jake Tran scores 44 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 14-17 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
100/100Dr. Trefor Bazett@drtreforScience & education

Dr. Trefor Bazett scores 100 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
100/100John Deere Kids@johndeerekidsScience & education

John Deere Kids scores 100 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
97/100Cleo Abram@cleoabramScience & education

Cleo Abram scores 97 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
96/100Papa Jake@papajakeArt & makingScience & education

Papa Jake scores 96 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
92/100Discovery@discoveryScience & education

Discovery scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were fear & disturbing themes and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed