Science & education for ages 14–17
Page 7 of 9
94/100Kitten Lady@kittenladyKitten Lady scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Let Me Explain Studios@letmeexplainstudiosLet Me Explain Studios scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Mark Rober@markroberMark Rober scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Periodic Videos@periodicvideosPeriodic Videos scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Real Science@realscienceReal Science scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100The king of DIY@thekingofdiyThe king of DIY scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
93/100abookutopia@abookutopiaabookutopia scores 93 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
93/100Renaissance Periodization@renaissanceperiodizationRenaissance Periodization scores 93 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
92/100Tasting History with Max Miller@tastinghistoryTasting History with Max Miller scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100Colin and Samir@colinandsamirColin and Samir scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100Smithsonian Channel@smithsonianchannelSmithsonian Channel scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
91/100MIT OpenCourseWare@mitocwMIT OpenCourseWare scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
91/100Wickens Wicked Reptiles@wickenswickedreptilesWickens Wicked Reptiles scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
90/100AsapSCIENCE@asapscienceAsapSCIENCE scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
90/100Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell@kurzgesagtKurzgesagt – In a Nutshell scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
90/1003x3Custom - Tamar@3x3customtamar3x3Custom - Tamar scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
90/100Geography Now@geographynowGeography Now scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
90/100NightHawkInLight@nighthawkinlightNightHawkInLight scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
90/100Simple History@simplehistorySimple History scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
89/100Hacksmith Industries@hacksmithHacksmith Industries scores 89 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
87/100Big Think@bigthinkBig Think scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
87/100Real Engineering@realengineeringReal Engineering scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
87/100Elizabeth Filips@elizabethfilipsElizabeth Filips scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
86/100TEDx Talks@tedxTEDx Talks scores 86 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed