Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Hacksmith Industries appropriate for kids?

@hacksmith · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

12 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 18, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

71of 100
For ages 8–10

Mild observed concern in the sample

Hacksmith Industries scores 71 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 8-10 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageLow observed concern96
Violence & intensityModerate observed concern67
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern100
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern93
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern100
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern94
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern99
Commercial pressureMild observed concern70
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Mild use of strong language (censored in video).
  • Depiction of lighting a car on fire, though with safety measures discussed.
  • Some references to minor physical risk (e.g., driving fast, simulated seat movement).
  • Some technical jargon and detailed process may be complex for younger children.
  • Mentions of radiation and weaponry concepts in a fictional context.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video81/100

We've kept this project secret for months!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mild use of strong language (censored in video).
  • Depiction of lighting a car on fire, though with safety measures discussed.
  • Some references to minor physical risk (e.g., driving fast, simulated seat movement).
recent · standard video78/100

The Missing Piece of Fallout Power Armor | Power Armor (Part 8/6)

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Some technical jargon and detailed process may be complex for younger children.
  • Mentions of radiation and weaponry concepts in a fictional context.
  • Mild stress and frustration shown due to project challenges and deadlines.
recent · standard video70/100

We Made a Knife that can CUT THROUGH ANYTHING!

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains promotional content and commercial appeals for Kickstarter and merchandise.
  • Mentions knife use and cutting capabilities, which may require adult supervision for younger viewers.
  • Educational insight into product design and engineering.
recent · standard video81/100

The Power Armor Legs Are Complete! ⚡| Real Life Power Armor (Part 7/6)

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Some mechanical and pneumatic systems involve potential physical risks if mishandled.
  • The suit is heavy and can be unstable without proper support, posing a fall hazard.
  • Use of tools like grinders and welding requires caution and adult supervision.
recent · standard video36/100

Making BULLET PROOF Power Armor | Real Life Power Armor (Part 6/?)

Score for ages 8–10 · High observed concern in the sample
  • Contains live firearm discharge and ballistic testing which may be distressing or inappropriate for young children.
  • Includes discussion and demonstration of weapons and ammunition.
  • Mentions manufacturing and use of body armor which may require adult supervision and legal considerations.
popular · standard video81/100

Hybrid Power Systems! | Real Life Power Armor (Part 4/6)

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains a sponsored advertisement segment which may be seen as commercial pressure
  • Technical jargon and engineering details may be complex for younger children
  • Detailed explanation of actuator types and engineering trade-offs
popular · standard video53/100

Making my Skull BULLETPROOF with Real Life Adamantium!?

Score for ages 8–10 · Moderate observed concern in the sample
  • Contains depiction of firearms being discharged at a skull replica
  • Includes discussion and demonstration of explosive materials (tannerite)
  • Mentions potential dangers of metal fragments and gunfire
popular · standard video81/100

I put jet engines on a SLED and broke a WORLD RECORD

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains scenes of high-speed vehicle operation with inherent risks.
  • Mentions a crash and loss of control at high speed, though no graphic details.
  • Includes some mild strong language (e.g., 'goddamn').
popular · standard video78/100

Building Robotic Hands | Real Life Power Armor (Part 5/6)

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Some technical jargon and concepts may be complex for younger children to fully understand.
  • Brief casual language and mild informal expressions are present but not offensive.
  • Mentions of tools and equipment that require adult supervision if replicated.
popular · standard video70/100

ORBITRON vs World's Most Destructive BATTLEBOTS (VIDEO #5/6)

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains descriptions of robot combat with impacts and mechanical damage, which may be intense for very young children.
  • Mentions technical failures and software glitches that affect competition outcomes, which might be confusing without context.
  • Includes some mild tension and disappointment related to competition losses.
popular · standard video73/100

$1 Robot vs $200,000 Robot

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mentions use of robots with weapons (flamethrowers, guns) in passing, but not graphically or in detail.
  • Includes some mild humor referencing burying a body and workplace violence in a lighthearted context.
  • Contains some casual language and mild informal speech typical of YouTube content.
popular · standard video78/100

TOMBSTONE vs ORBITRON (VIDEO #6/6)

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Some technical jargon and detailed engineering discussion may be complex for younger children.
  • The video includes promotional content and sponsorship mentions, which may influence viewers.
  • There is a brief moment of technical difficulty and robot damage, which might be mildly intense for very young viewers.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method