Gaming for ages 14–17
Page 8 of 10
Bandites scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedBasicallyIDoWrk scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedBranzy scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedMeganPlays scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedNicoBlox scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedMarkiplier showed low observed concern for ages 14-17 across 12 analyzed videos. The most notable observed areas were fear & disturbing themes and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was engaging and humorous commentary that maintains viewer interest.
12 videos reviewedLuke TheNotable scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedNick Eh 30 scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedPWR scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedTimTheTatman scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedTommyInnit scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedWisp scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedEurogamer scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedJeruhmi scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedVanossGaming scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedMagicGum scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
11 videos reviewedjacksepticeye scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedFynnpire scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedPewDiePie scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewedHacksmith Industries scores 89 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedjschlattLIVE scores 89 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedLaughability scores 89 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedLaurenZside scores 89 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were fear & disturbing themes and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewedSunny and Melon scores 89 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed