YouTube creator age ratings

Find YouTube creators by age and interest

Search a channel your child already watches, or choose an age and interest to find evidence-backed parent guides. The adult parent makes the final decision.

143 published guides

Art & making for ages 14–17

Page 6 of 6

92/100Cody'sLab@thecodyreederArt & making

Cody'sLab scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
92/100Johnnie Guilbert@johnnieguilbertArt & making

Johnnie Guilbert scores 92 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
91/100RTGame@rtgameArt & making

RTGame scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
91/100PWR@pwrArt & makingGaming

PWR scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
90/100LavenderTowne@lavendertowneArt & making

LavenderTowne scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
90/100Alexandra Gater@alexandragaterArt & making

Alexandra Gater scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
90/100Simple History@simplehistoryAnimation & comedyArt & making

Simple History scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
90/100sophdoeslife@sophdoeslifeArt & making

sophdoeslife scores 90 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
89/100The Act Man@theactmanArt & makingGaming

The Act Man scores 89 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
88/100The Game Theorists@gametheoryArt & makingGaming

The Game Theorists scores 88 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
88/100Denis Moreno@denisArt & making

Denis Moreno scores 88 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
87/100Jazza@jazzaArt & making

Jazza scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
87/100Smokin' & Grillin with AB@smokinandgrillinwithabArt & making

Smokin' & Grillin with AB scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
86/100HistoryMarche@historymarcheAnimation & comedyArt & making

HistoryMarche scores 86 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
85/100ambiguousamphibian@ambiguousamphibianArt & making

ambiguousamphibian scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
84/100The Film Theorists@filmtheoryArt & making

The Film Theorists scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
80/100Guga Foods@gugafoodsArt & makingFamily entertainment

Guga Foods scores 80 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
74/100Mercury Stardust@mercury_stardustArt & making

Mercury Stardust scores 74 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
54/100CinnamonToastKen@cinnamontoastkenArt & makingFamily entertainment

CinnamonToastKen scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
54/100Knowing Better@knowingbetterAnimation & comedyArt & making

Knowing Better scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
53/100Shanspeare@shanspeareArt & making

Shanspeare scores 53 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
96/100Papa Jake@papajakeArt & makingScience & education

Papa Jake scores 96 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
54/100Purpose 2K15@purpose2k15Art & making

Purpose 2K15 scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed