Screen Signals creator assessment

Is ur mom ashley appropriate for kids?

@urmomashley · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

87of 100
For ages 8–10

Low observed concern in the sample

ur mom ashley scores 87 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 8-10 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageLow observed concern93
Violence & intensityLow observed concern100
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern100
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern93
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern95
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern97
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern96
Commercial pressureMild observed concern83
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Mild teasing and joking about a family member's absence in a joking manner
  • Some mild language and casual swearing (e.g., 'hell')
  • Brief mention of bodily functions in a humorous context
  • Mild references to minor injuries and discomfort
  • Some mild disappointment and emotional reactions related to sports outcomes.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video78/100

day in my life LA vs. NYC vlog *I'm balancing a lot lol*

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains promotional content and sponsorship disclosures, which may influence viewer purchasing behavior.
  • Includes casual language and some mild slang expressions.
  • Some scenes show minor physical discomfort (e.g., hair rollers causing neck pain) but are presented humorously.
recent · standard video98/100

you gotta be kidding me

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Some mild disappointment and emotional reactions related to sports outcomes.
  • Brief mention of feeling nervous and tired, but no distressing content.
  • Shows positive social interactions and friendship.
recent · standard video93/100

we got in a fight

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mild teasing and joking about a family member's absence in a joking manner
  • Some mild language and casual swearing (e.g., 'hell')
  • Brief mention of bodily functions in a humorous context
popular · standard video94/100

our perfect day in ORANGE COUNTY (sibling vlog + itinerary)

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mild informal language and casual slang expressions.
  • Some promotional content and sponsorship mentions, which may influence children.
  • Brief mention of emotional tiredness and crying, handled sensitively.
popular · standard video81/100

quarter life crisis.

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mentions mild frustration and anxiety about life decisions, which may resonate differently with sensitive viewers.
  • Contains casual mild language with some implied mild profanity censored.
  • Includes brief references to alcohol consumption at a party (mentioning Guinness and house parties).
popular · standard video91/100

my first ever girls trip (IRELAND vlog 🇮🇪)

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mild casual profanity used occasionally
  • Alcohol consumption is shown and discussed in a social context
  • Shows positive friendship and social bonding
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method