Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Tabbes appropriate for kids?

@tabbes · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

82of 100
For ages 8–10

Mild observed concern in the sample

Tabbes scores 82 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 8-10 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageMild observed concern79
Violence & intensityLow observed concern90
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern96
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern97
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern86
Fear & disturbing themesMild observed concern84
Mature & sensitive topicsMild observed concern78
Commercial pressureLow observed concern96
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Use of mild to moderate profanity
  • Some sarcastic and irreverent humor that may not suit all children
  • Mentions of animal care challenges that might be distressing to sensitive viewers
  • Mild profanity used occasionally
  • Some casual references to minor frustrations and social teasing
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video78/100

Getting Scammed Online

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild strong language (e.g., 'fuck').
  • Mentions illegal activities like jailbreaking and downloading unauthorized software.
  • Describes computer viruses, ransomware, and scams in some detail, which might be disturbing to sensitive viewers.
recent · standard video96/100

A Strange Day

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Some mild confusion and mild anxiety depicted in dream context
  • Brief mention of weapons but in a non-threatening, surreal manner
  • Humorous and lighthearted tone
recent · standard video78/100

Buying a Forbidden Pet

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Use of mild to moderate profanity
  • Some sarcastic and irreverent humor that may not suit all children
  • Mentions of animal care challenges that might be distressing to sensitive viewers
popular · standard video70/100

Being Mute for 3 Years

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild strong language (e.g., 'bull****', 'fuckin').
  • Mentions difficult family environment and emotional struggles without graphic detail.
  • Includes some references to mild violence (e.g., 'glass thrown your way') in a non-graphic context.
popular · standard video96/100

BREAKING INTO THE ROOFTOP (Roommate Stories)

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mild profanity used occasionally
  • Some casual references to minor frustrations and social teasing
  • Humorous and relatable depiction of college dorm life
popular · standard video73/100

MY SCHOOL RIOT

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains mild crude language and slang (e.g., 'Get yo ass over here').
  • Depicts disruptive student behavior including throwing objects and chanting aggressively.
  • Mentions drug activity and fights as background context for the rule change.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method