Screen Signals creator assessment

Is SHAYTARDS appropriate for kids?

@shaytards · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 17, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

96of 100
For ages 8–10

Low observed concern in the sample

SHAYTARDS scores 96 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 8-10 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageLow observed concern93
Violence & intensityLow observed concern100
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern96
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern95
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern95
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern100
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern94
Commercial pressureLow observed concern96
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Some mild humor about bodily functions (e.g., diarrhea)
  • Emotional content about a child moving out may be sensitive for some children
  • Mild informal language and casual humor that may include some slang.
  • Brief mention of steroids in a cautionary context, but no promotion or detailed discussion.
  • Some mild teasing and ego-related jokes among family members.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video97/100

HAPPY 19th BiRTHDAY EMMi!

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mild teasing and joking around
  • Some casual mild language like 'damn'
  • Positive family interactions and celebrations
recent · standard video94/100

TOO COOL FOR SCHOOL!

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Some mild humor about bodily functions (e.g., diarrhea)
  • Emotional content about a child moving out may be sensitive for some children
  • Positive family interactions and humor
recent · standard video96/100

WATERMELON WHiSPERER!

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mild informal language and casual humor that may include some slang.
  • Brief mention of steroids in a cautionary context, but no promotion or detailed discussion.
  • Some mild teasing and ego-related jokes among family members.
popular · standard video94/100

OUR SON iS MOViNG...Again!

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mild teasing and joking about physical appearance within family context.
  • Mentions of relationship challenges due to long-distance work situation.
  • Casual language and some mild informal expressions.
popular · standard video97/100

THE DAY OUR FAMiLY CAME BACK TOGETHER!

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mild casual language including a single mild expletive ('damn')
  • Brief joking mention of 'drugs' but clearly not promoted or depicted
  • Some teasing and playful sarcasm among family members
popular · standard video100/100

LiFE BEGiNS NOW! Go get em girl!

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Positive family interactions and support during a milestone event
  • Encouragement to be present and use all senses to enjoy the moment
  • Light humor and playful banter among participants
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method