Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Peacock appropriate for kids?

@peacock · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 21, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
79of 100

Peacock

For ages 8–10

A few concerns to review

The main things to review are mature and sensitive topics, and harassment and role modeling. Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageA few concerns82
Violence & intensityFew concerns96
Sexual or suggestive contentA few concerns81
Substances & risky behaviorA few concerns84
Harassment & role modelingA few concerns80
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns95
Mature & sensitive topicsA few concerns75
Commercial pressureFew concerns100
Positive things we found
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appeared more than once.
  • Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Mild references to alcohol consumption and intoxication
  • Some teasing and sarcastic remarks about relationships
  • Brief mention of sneaking drinks and being banned from a restaurant
  • Contains mild to moderate strong language (e.g., 'God damn', 'fucked').
  • References to sexual experiences and adult relationships.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video76/100

The Middle | Axl Screws Up Sue’s Perfect School Schedule

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mentions marijuana in a school context, though not promoted.
  • Some mild teasing and social conflict among peers.
  • References to detention and tardiness consequences.
recent · standard video78/100

The Office | 12 Minutes of Ryan vs Pam: The Greatest TV Rivalry

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mild language including a censored expletive.
  • Some mild interpersonal insults and teasing.
  • References to social issues like homelessness in a comedic context, which may require parental guidance for younger viewers.
recent · standard video70/100

Yellowstone | 11 Minutes of John & Beth Dutton Being the Perfect Father-Daughter Duo

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains mild to moderate strong language (e.g., 'God damn', 'fucked').
  • References to sexual experiences and adult relationships.
  • Themes of loss, loneliness, and emotional pain are present.
popular · standard video85/100

Little House on the Prairie | Nancy Cheating on Her Homework Comes Back To Bite Her

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • The video includes a scenario of cheating and dishonesty which may require parental discussion.
  • There is mild social conflict and name-calling among children, which could be sensitive for some viewers.
  • The content promotes understanding of honesty and the consequences of cheating.
popular · standard video70/100

Supernatural | Claire Exposes Alex's Secret Life at the Dinner Table

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mentions of missing persons and stalking animals may be mildly unsettling to very young children.
  • The discussion of birth control and sexual activity is direct but not explicit, which may require parental guidance depending on the child's maturity.
  • References to hunting monsters and some mild tension in dialogue may be confusing or mildly intense for younger viewers.
popular · standard video74/100

The Office | Chili’s Can’t Contain Pam’s Energy During the Dundies

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mild references to alcohol consumption and intoxication
  • Some teasing and sarcastic remarks about relationships
  • Brief mention of sneaking drinks and being banned from a restaurant
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method