Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Hashtag United appropriate for kids?

@hashtagunited · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
85of 100

Hashtag United

For ages 8–10

Few concerns found

The main thing to review is commercial pressure. Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageFew concerns95
Violence & intensityFew concerns89
Sexual or suggestive contentFew concerns100
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns97
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns96
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns96
Mature & sensitive topicsFew concerns100
Commercial pressureA few concerns81
Positive things we found
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Some mild casual language and teasing that may be slightly competitive but not offensive.
  • Brief mention of a player injury with no graphic detail, handled sensitively.
  • Use of slang and informal speech that may require parental explanation for younger children.
  • Contains some mild informal language and slang that may be unfamiliar to younger children.
  • Includes casual references to alcohol consumption (mentioning having a couple of beers).
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video94/100

The First Home Game Of The Season

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Contains some mild informal language and slang that may be unfamiliar to younger children.
  • Includes casual references to alcohol consumption (mentioning having a couple of beers).
  • Some mild competitive banter and teasing among players.
recent · standard video78/100

The First Game Of The Season

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Contains mild competitive banter and casual informal language
  • Includes a brief mention of a 'not nice tackle' and a minor collision between players
  • Some mild physical contact described as part of the game
recent · standard video93/100

We Rebuilt Our Entire Football Team

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Mentions of injuries and player retirements which might be sensitive to some viewers.
  • Discussion of competitive sports dynamics including losses and challenges.
  • Provides an in-depth look at team rebuilding and strategy in non-league football.
popular · standard video81/100

We Played KSI's Football Club

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Some mild casual language and teasing that may be slightly competitive but not offensive.
  • Brief mention of a player injury with no graphic detail, handled sensitively.
  • Use of slang and informal speech that may require parental explanation for younger children.
popular · standard video92/100

We Faced an Indian Wonderkid...

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Contains some mild competitive tension and references to physical play and fouls typical in sports.
  • Mentions of injuries and player fitness which are standard in sports contexts.
  • Provides detailed and engaging sports commentary suitable for football fans.
popular · standard video87/100

Football But the Rules Change Every 10 Minutes

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Mild language including occasional mild expletives.
  • One player suffers a facial injury resulting in a lost tooth, though not graphically described.
  • Competitive sports contact may be intense for very young viewers.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method