Screen Signals creator assessment

Is England appropriate for kids?

@england · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 21, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

96of 100
For ages 8–10

Low observed concern in the sample

England scores 96 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 8-10 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageLow observed concern94
Violence & intensityLow observed concern100
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern100
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern100
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern92
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern100
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern100
Commercial pressureLow observed concern95
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Some mild teasing and informal language
  • Casual competitive banter
  • Contains some mild teasing and playful mind games that are typical in competitive settings
  • Some casual language and mild teasing present
  • References to sports competition and physical activity
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video92/100

Who will come out on top in the ultimate game of deception? 🦊 | Lionesses: Fox in a Box | Episode 1

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Contains some mild teasing and playful mind games that are typical in competitive settings
  • Encourages strategic thinking and bluffing skills
  • Features positive social interaction and friendly competition
recent · standard video96/100

Bromances, Wonderwall, Pranks & Banter! | Best Bits | Lions’ Den Connected by EE

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Some casual language and mild teasing present
  • References to sports competition and physical activity
  • Positive portrayal of teamwork and friendship among players
recent · standard video97/100

Anderson flips 🔥 Bellingham & Rogers Bring Vibes 😂 & Stones' Dance Scares Tuchel! 😱 | Best of Camp

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Some mild teasing and informal language
  • Casual competitive banter
  • Friendly and humorous interactions among players
popular · standard video96/100

Beckham visits the squad 👋 Stones' darts skills 🎯 Rogers previews Argentina 🇦🇷 | Extra Time | Ep. 8

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Some mild competitive tension and playful teasing
  • Casual use of informal language and slang
  • Positive portrayal of teamwork and sportsmanship
popular · standard video97/100

Ed Sheeran private gig 🎸 Stones pranks Tuchel 🤣 Gordon's shooting tutorial 🎯 | Extra Time | Ep. 7

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Some mild competitive teasing that is playful in nature
  • Shows teamwork and camaraderie among players
  • Provides insight into professional athlete recovery and training
popular · standard video97/100

Saka, Eze & Madueke talk Argentina & birthday banter | England | Ep.20 | Lions' Den Connected by EE

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mild casual language and playful teasing among friends, which is typical in informal sports interviews.
  • Some mild competitive banter and joking insults, but all in a friendly context.
  • Positive portrayal of teamwork and sportsmanship among young athletes.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method