Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Duke Dennis appropriate for kids?

@dukedennisamp · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 17, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

78of 100
For ages 8–10

Mild observed concern in the sample

Duke Dennis scores 78 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 8-10 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageMild observed concern74
Violence & intensityLow observed concern100
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern95
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern94
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern95
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern100
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern94
Commercial pressureLow observed concern92
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate strong language and slang.
  • Some teasing and banter that might be misunderstood by younger viewers.
  • References to alcohol consumption and partying, though not depicted in detail.
  • Casual mention of gambling amounts, which may be inappropriate for younger audiences.
  • Frequent mild profanity and slang
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video76/100

Last Day at Streamer University

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent mild profanity and slang
  • References to partying and staying up late
  • Some teasing and mild insults among friends
recent · standard video78/100

2AM at Streamer University

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate strong language and slang.
  • Some teasing and banter that might be misunderstood by younger viewers.
  • References to alcohol consumption and partying, though not depicted in detail.
recent · standard video89/100

24 HOURS AT STREAMER UNIVERSITY

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mild use of casual profanity and slang that may be unfamiliar or mildly inappropriate for younger children.
  • Some social teasing and mild interpersonal conflict that is typical in peer interactions.
  • Brief references to relationship issues and dating that may require parental guidance for younger viewers.
popular · standard video78/100

Midnight In Atlanta

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity throughout The video.
  • Some slang and language may be inappropriate for younger children.
  • Mentions of 'honey packs' and 'rhino pills' which are risky substances, though discussed briefly and not promoted.
popular · standard video78/100

Being A Professor At Streamer University

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent mild profanity and slang that may be confusing or inappropriate for younger children.
  • Informal and sometimes disrespectful language among peers.
  • Some references to drinking and social partying, though not detailed or promoted.
popular · standard video78/100

24 Hours In Germany

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent mild profanity (censored in video).
  • Casual references to alcohol consumption at Oktoberfest.
  • Informal language and slang that may be unfamiliar to younger children.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method