Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Cancelled with Tana Mongeau & Brooke Schofield appropriate for kids?

@cancelledpodcast · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

11 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 21, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

34of 100
For ages 8–10

High observed concern in the sample

Cancelled with Tana Mongeau & Brooke Schofield scores 34 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a low score using the ages 8-10 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageHigh observed concern46
Violence & intensityMild observed concern84
Sexual or suggestive contentMild observed concern77
Substances & risky behaviorModerate observed concern67
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern85
Fear & disturbing themesMild observed concern83
Mature & sensitive topicsHigh observed concern30
Commercial pressureMild observed concern82
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Mentions of past drug use including cocaine and alcohol.
  • Some strong language and casual swearing throughout.
  • Discussion of emotional distress and anxiety.
  • References to interpersonal conflicts and public controversies.
  • Mild profanity is used throughout the conversation.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video22/100

THE END OF THE CANCELLED PODCAST - Ep. 130

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Mentions of past drug use including cocaine and alcohol.
  • Some strong language and casual swearing throughout.
  • Discussion of emotional distress and anxiety.
recent · standard video70/100

TANA AND BROOKE REACT TO TRISHA PAYTAS BABY NAME, LOVE ISLAND CONTROVERSY AND MORE - Ep. 128

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mild profanity is used throughout the conversation.
  • Some discussions involve adult themes such as online hate, cancel culture, and mental health struggles.
  • Mentions of body image and cosmetic surgery with some body-shaming references in comments.
recent · standard video70/100

TREVI AND TANA’S BLACKOUT BELLA THORNE STORIES… - Ep. 127

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Mild to moderate profanity throughout
  • Discussions of alcohol and drug use
  • References to sexual topics and adult relationships
recent · standard video70/100

the truth about Cancelled ending… - Ep. 126

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Use of mild strong language (e.g., 'f***') occasionally to express emotion.
  • Discussion of mental health struggles including crying and feeling overwhelmed.
  • Mentions of vomiting due to emotional distress.
popular · standard video29/100

Camilla Araújo on Bhad Bhabie, Alabama Barker, Ash Trevino and MORE.. - Ep. 113

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent strong language and profanity.
  • Discusses mature themes such as toxic relationships, substance use, online harassment, and legal threats.
  • Includes references to sexual harassment and adult interpersonal conflicts.
popular · standard video70/100

WE RATED INFLUENCER'S AWFUL COACHELLA OUTFITS - Ep. 118

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent mild profanity and some adult language.
  • Includes discussions of interpersonal conflicts and social drama among influencers.
  • Mentions alcohol consumption and gambling anecdotes.
popular · standard video4/100

A Conversation with Kayla Malec on Life After Speaking Out About an Abusive Relationship - Ep. 124

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Contains frequent strong language and profanity.
  • Discusses detailed experiences of physical and emotional abuse.
  • Mentions legal issues and court proceedings related to abuse.
popular · standard video29/100

TANA’S HORROR STORY MIAMI TRIP… - Ep. 116

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of strong profanity and explicit language.
  • References to substance use and effects (e.g., pseudafed, alcohol).
  • Discussion of plastic surgery and body image topics in detail.
popular · standard video70/100

Tana CRASHED Kylie Jenner’s private dinner.. - Ep. 114

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent mild coarse language and casual swearing throughout The video.
  • References to alcohol consumption, including drinking habits and effects.
  • Mentions of drug use, including mushrooms and other substances, discussed in a casual manner.
popular · standard video22/100

Chelsea Handler confronts Tana for stalking her at the airport.. - Ep. 115

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • Frequent use of strong language and profanity.
  • Explicit discussions of drug use and sexual topics.
  • References to substance abuse and mental health struggles.
popular · standard video22/100

why the cancelled podcast is ending… - Ep. 123

Score for ages 8–10 · Very high observed concern in the sample
  • The conversation contains frequent mild profanity and casual swearing.
  • There are references to adult relationship issues, including infidelity and emotional abuse, discussed in a non-graphic but mature manner.
  • Some discussions involve complex social dynamics and public controversies that may be confusing without context.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method