Age-specific YouTube parent guides

YouTube channels for kids ages 5–7

Compare YouTube channel age ratings for early elementary-age children, with separate scores for language, violence, mature topics, commercial pressure, and other concerns. These are parent decision-support ratings, not a guarantee that every upload is appropriate.

1134 published guides

Less scary content for ages 5–7

Page 46 of 48

29/100Kai Cenat@kaicenatPopular entertainment

Kai Cenat scores 29 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
28/100History Matters@historymattersScience & education

History Matters scores 28 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
27/100Cole Hastings@colehastingsPopular entertainment

Cole Hastings scores 27 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
27/100JEFF FM@jefffmPopular entertainment

JEFF FM scores 27 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
27/100The LeRoys@theleroysFamily entertainment

The LeRoys scores 27 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
26/100TheRussianBadger@therussianbadgerPopular entertainment

TheRussianBadger scores 26 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
23/100JUST TRISH PODCAST@justtrishpodcastPopular entertainment

JUST TRISH PODCAST scores 23 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
22/100Climate Town@climatetownPopular entertainment

Climate Town scores 22 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
22/100tiffanyferg@tiffanyfergPopular entertainment

tiffanyferg scores 22 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
21/100Nogla@daithidenoglaPopular entertainment

Nogla scores 21 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were language and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
20/100amandamaryanna@amandamaryannaPopular entertainment

amandamaryanna scores 20 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
19/100Broey Deschanel@broeydeschanelPopular entertainment

Broey Deschanel scores 19 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and sexual or suggestive content. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
13/100FLAGRANT@officialflagrantPopular entertainment

FLAGRANT scores 13 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and language. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
12/100Jordan Theresa@jordanatheresaPopular entertainment

Jordan Theresa scores 12 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and commercial pressure.

6 videos reviewed
10/100The Financial Diet@thefinancialdietScience & education

The Financial Diet scores 10 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
7/100Cut@cutPopular entertainment

Cut scores 7 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a very low score using the ages 5-7 rubric because of the observed concern patterns. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
97/100John Deere Kids@johndeerekidsScience & education

John Deere Kids scores 97 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
93/100Magnus Carlsen@themagnuscarlsenPopular entertainment

Magnus Carlsen scores 93 out of 100 for ages 5-7. Based on this sample, the channel appears appropriate for most viewers ages 5-7. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
92/100Red Bull Motorsports@redbullmotorsportsPopular entertainment

Red Bull Motorsports showed low observed concern for ages 5-7 across 7 analyzed videos. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

12 videos reviewed
92/100Golden Hoops@goldenhoopsproductionPopular entertainment

Golden Hoops scores 92 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
92/100MonikaFit@monikafittFamily entertainment

MonikaFit scores 92 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern.

6 videos reviewed
92/100RedFalcon@redfalcontvPopular entertainment

RedFalcon scores 92 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
91/100FoxyMakesVideos@foxymakesvideosPopular entertainment

FoxyMakesVideos scores 91 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed
90/100Dr. Trefor Bazett@drtreforScience & education

Dr. Trefor Bazett scores 90 out of 100 for ages 5-7. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 5-7 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.

6 videos reviewed