Less scary content for ages 14–17
Page 61 of 61
94/100Ryan Mitchell@ryanmitchellytRyan Mitchell scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
94/100Kenobi@brickdennis-gamingandcomic803Kenobi scores 94 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
91/100Yumi@yumiYumi scores 91 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
89/100FlameFrags@flamefragsmcFlameFrags scores 89 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
89/100Spoke@spokeishereSpoke scores 89 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
85/100YMH Clips@ymhclipsYMH Clips scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100Will Tennyson@willtennysonWill Tennyson scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
79/100TheOneWhosReady@theonewhosready-828TheOneWhosReady scores 79 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
8 videos reviewed
76/100ChainsFR@chainsfrChainsFR scores 76 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
73/100NELK@nelkfilmzNELK scores 73 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
54/100PowerfulJRE@joeroganPowerfulJRE scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sample includes enough age-relevant concerns that a parent should review the findings before choosing this channel for ages 14-17. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
54/100LOL! Network@lolnetworkLOL! Network scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
54/100Purpose 2K15@purpose2k15Purpose 2K15 scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed