Less swearing for ages 14–17
Page 53 of 62
85/100BFFs: Josh Richards & Bri Chickenfry@bffspodBFFs: Josh Richards & Bri Chickenfry scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
85/100SeeDeng@seedengSeeDeng scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
85/100CoryxKenshin@coryxkenshinCoryxKenshin scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
85/100Jake Paul@jakepaulJake Paul scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
85/100ColdFusion@coldfusionColdFusion scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
85/100Fudgy@fudgyyyyFudgy scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
85/100Jen Phelps@jenphelpsJen Phelps scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
85/100Legundo@legundoLegundo scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
85/100NikkieTutorials@nikkietutorialsNikkieTutorials scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
85/100RussoPlays@russoplaysgamesRussoPlays scores 85 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100Best Ever Food Review Show@besteverfoodreviewshowBest Ever Food Review Show scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100Doctor Mike@doctormikeDoctor Mike scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100Mikaela Long@mikaelalongMikaela Long scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100Noel Deyzel@noeldeyzelNoel Deyzel scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100The Boys@yeptheboysThe Boys scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100The Film Theorists@filmtheoryThe Film Theorists scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and fear & disturbing themes. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100UnJaded Jade@unjadedjadeUnJaded Jade scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100National Geographic@natgeoNational Geographic scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
84/100Eddy Burback@eddyburbackEddy Burback scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100Jean's Thoughts@jeansthoughtsJean's Thoughts scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100Kurtis Conner@kurtisconnerKurtis Conner scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100Not Enough Nelsons@notenoughnelsonsNot Enough Nelsons scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
84/100The Living Tombstone@thelivingtombstoneThe Living Tombstone scores 84 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
83/100Harald Baldr@haraldbaldrHarald Baldr scores 83 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a generally strong score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with some observed cautions. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed