Less scary content for ages 14–17
Page 51 of 61
88/100Not Just Bikes@notjustbikesNot Just Bikes scores 88 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
88/100Vsauce@vsauceVsauce scores 88 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
88/100B_Ra1n@nihachuB_Ra1n scores 88 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
88/100Mario@mario-worldwideMario scores 88 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content.
6 videos reviewed
87/100Big Think@bigthinkBig Think scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
87/100Cheap Lazy Vegan@cheaplazyveganCheap Lazy Vegan scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
87/100Deestroying@deestroyingDeestroying scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
87/100Jazza@jazzaJazza scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
87/100McCreamy@mccreamyMcCreamy scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity and language. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
87/100Real Engineering@realengineeringReal Engineering scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
87/100Ted Nivison@tednivisonTed Nivison scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
87/100TigerBelly@tigerbellyTigerBelly scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
87/100DrLupo@drlupoDrLupo scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were language and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
87/100ThreeFold@threefoldThreeFold scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
87/100Angelica Nyqvist@angelicanyqvistAngelica Nyqvist scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
87/100DarkViperAU@darkviperauDarkViperAU scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
87/100Elizabeth Filips@elizabethfilipsElizabeth Filips scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
87/100Nick Jr.@nickjrNick Jr. scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
87/100Peter Santenello@petersantenelloPeter Santenello scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
87/100Quackity@quackityQuackity scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were sexual or suggestive content and language. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
87/100Self Sufficient Me@selfsufficientmeSelf Sufficient Me scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
87/100Smokin' & Grillin with AB@smokinandgrillinwithabSmokin' & Grillin with AB scores 87 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were commercial pressure. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
86/100Baseball Doesn't Exist@baseballdoesntexistBaseball Doesn't Exist scores 86 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and violence & intensity. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
86/100Chad Chad@thechadx2Chad Chad scores 86 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were harassment & role modeling and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed