Gaming for ages 14–17
Page 10 of 10
56/100HasanAbi@hasanabiHasanAbi scores 56 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were mature & sensitive topics and harassment & role modeling. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
54/100PopularMMOs@popularmmosPopularMMOs scores 54 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a mixed score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with findings a parent may want to examine. The most notable observed areas were substances & risky behavior and mature & sensitive topics. A positive pattern was kindness, empathy, or supportive relationships appear in multiple sampled videos.
12 videos reviewed
99/100Caleb Gannon Gaming@calebgannongamingCaleb Gannon Gaming scores 99 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
97/100j0rts@j0rtsj0rts scores 97 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
97/100Mogswamp@mogswampMogswamp scores 97 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
97/100RAINBOLT@georainboltRAINBOLT scores 97 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
97/100Tonigon@tonigonTonigon scores 97 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
96/100Premfn@premfnPremfn scores 96 out of 100 for ages 14-17. Based on this sample, the channel appears appropriate for most viewers ages 14-17. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
95/100Flowtives@flowtivesFlowtives scores 95 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed
89/100Spoke@spokeishereSpoke scores 89 out of 100 for ages 14-17. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 14-17 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The most notable observed areas were violence & intensity. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
6 videos reviewed