Screen Signals creator assessment

Is Zach Justice 2 appropriate for kids?

@zachjustice · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 20, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

ScreenSignals.ai
68of 100

Zach Justice 2

For ages 8–10

Some concerns to review

The main things to review are language, and sexual or suggestive content. Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.

High confidence based on 6 videos reviewed
LanguageSome concerns64
Violence & intensityFew concerns91
Sexual or suggestive contentA few concerns75
Substances & risky behaviorFew concerns94
Harassment & role modelingFew concerns89
Fear & disturbing themesFew concerns96
Mature & sensitive topicsA few concerns83
Commercial pressureFew concerns86
Positive things we found
  • Humor or playful interaction appeared more than once.
  • Teamwork, cooperation, or sportsmanship appeared more than once.
Things a parent may want to know
  • Contains mild profanity and casual use of mild expletives.
  • Includes a brief depiction and discussion of a sexual act in a comedic context.
  • Some jokes reference mental illness and Down syndrome, which may be sensitive for some viewers.
  • Occasional use of slang and informal language that may be unclear to younger children.
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity and crude language.
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the videos

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video96/100

Guess Who But It’s Every Influencer You Know (And Hate)

Score for ages 8–10 · Few concerns
  • Some mild language and casual swearing occur occasionally.
  • There are references to ethnicity and sexual orientation that might require parental guidance for younger viewers.
  • Some jokes and comments about appearance and relationships may be interpreted as teasing or mild stereotyping.
recent · standard video53/100

We Took This Card Game Way Too Seriously

Score for ages 8–10 · Some concerns
  • Frequent use of mild to moderate profanity and crude language.
  • Some sexual innuendo and suggestive remarks are present.
  • Jokes include references to violence and insults that may be inappropriate for younger children.
recent · standard video69/100

Our Drawings Got Worse Every Round

Score for ages 8–10 · Some concerns
  • Contains mild profanity and casual use of mild expletives.
  • Includes a brief depiction and discussion of a sexual act in a comedic context.
  • Some jokes reference mental illness and Down syndrome, which may be sensitive for some viewers.
popular · standard video76/100

We Answered Your Spiciest Questions

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Use of mild to moderate profanity and sexual innuendo.
  • References to mental health issues and medication (e.g., antidepressants, Xanax).
  • Some crude humor and bodily function references.
popular · standard video81/100

I Couldn't Trust Ava or Jules Playing Imposters

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mild use of crude language and occasional mild sexual innuendo may be inappropriate for very young children.
  • Some references and jokes may be confusing or obscure for younger viewers.
  • The casual mention of bodily functions and minor crude humor might be off-putting to sensitive viewers.
popular · standard video76/100

Playing Codenames With The Dumbest Smart People I Know

Score for ages 8–10 · A few concerns
  • Mild to moderate use of profanity throughout the video.
  • Some sexual innuendo and crude jokes are present.
  • Brief discussion of gender identity and LGBTQ+ topics in a casual manner.
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. The score reflects the evidence collected on the displayed analysis date and does not update automatically.

See the complete sampling and scoring method