Screen Signals creator assessment

Is William Osman appropriate for kids?

@williamosman · A parent-focused assessment based on a sample of recent and popular public long-form videos, not a review of every upload.

6 videos analyzed Last analyzed August 17, 2026View channel on YouTube
Scores by age

Age-specific assessment

Choose an age range.

89of 100
For ages 8–10

Low observed concern in the sample

William Osman scores 89 out of 100 for ages 8-10. The sampled videos produced a high score using the ages 8-10 rubric, with relatively few observed concerns. The sampled videos did not show a recurring high-concern pattern. A positive pattern was creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.

high confidence from the available video sample
LanguageLow observed concern94
Violence & intensityLow observed concern86
Sexual or suggestive contentLow observed concern100
Substances & risky behaviorLow observed concern100
Harassment & role modelingLow observed concern95
Fear & disturbing themesLow observed concern95
Mature & sensitive topicsLow observed concern100
Commercial pressureLow observed concern85
Positive patterns in the sample
  • Creativity, imagination, or constructive problem-solving appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Educational or thought-provoking material appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Perseverance, resilience, or healthy challenge appears in multiple sampled videos.
  • Humor or playful interaction appears in multiple sampled videos.
Things a parent may want to know
  • The video shows use of an electrified carpet that delivers electric shocks, which could be unsafe or harmful if replicated by children.
  • There is mild risk-taking behavior demonstrated, such as handling electric devices without full safety precautions.
  • Some mild language is implied but not explicit in The video (e.g., a censored expletive).
  • Contains references to weapon-like modifications (flamethrower, taser, knife) which may be concerning to some parents.
  • Mild language and some crude humor (e.g., references to body parts and mild swear words).
Videos reviewed

A quick look at the sample

See the individual videos that shaped this assessment and the main points an adult parent may want to know.

recent · standard video93/100

i tried increasing my pain tolerance

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mentions and demonstrations of pain and discomfort using heat and cold sensations.
  • Use of mild crude humor and casual language.
  • References to minor physical discomfort and burning sensations, though not graphic.
recent · standard video80/100

I Turned 1-Star Toys into Military Nightmares

Score for ages 8–10 · Mild observed concern in the sample
  • Contains references to weapon-like modifications (flamethrower, taser, knife) which may be concerning to some parents.
  • Mild language and some crude humor (e.g., references to body parts and mild swear words).
  • Some scenes involve potentially dangerous devices (flamethrower, taser) though safety is mentioned and no actual harm is shown.
recent · standard video94/100

Someone Paid $10,000 to Patent This

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Some technical descriptions involve electrical components and power tools, which might require adult supervision for younger viewers.
  • Mentions of animal trapping and handling may need parental guidance to explain humane treatment and safety.
  • Brief joke about running over a construction worker is not graphic but could be misinterpreted without context.
popular · standard video93/100

Training My Roomate To Walk Quietly

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • The video shows use of an electrified carpet that delivers electric shocks, which could be unsafe or harmful if replicated by children.
  • There is mild risk-taking behavior demonstrated, such as handling electric devices without full safety precautions.
  • Some mild language is implied but not explicit in The video (e.g., a censored expletive).
popular · standard video85/100

How I Almost Ruined MrBeast Squid Game

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Mentions simulated 'killing' and 'murder' in a fictional context which might be sensitive for younger viewers.
  • Contains some mild crude humor and references to bodily functions and language (e.g., 'pissing', 'crack').
  • Includes brief depiction of simulated blood and explosions as part of special effects.
popular · standard video97/100

How Much Sawdust Can You Put In A Rice Crispy?

Score for ages 8–10 · Low observed concern in the sample
  • Contains casual language and some mild crude humor (e.g., references to bodily functions and informal speech).
  • Includes a brief sponsored message promoting Audible, which may be considered commercial pressure.
  • Some descriptions of texture and taste might be off-putting to sensitive viewers (e.g., comparing treats to 'brick' or 'wood glue').
Read this score correctly

A channel assessment is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The assessment evaluates observable patterns in the sampled videos. It does not cover private or deleted videos, comments, recommendations, livestream behavior, visual-only moments that cannot be reliably identified, or every upload.

Creator-controlled source material is treated only as evidence and cannot instruct or override the analysis. Pages are refreshed and may be unpublished when evidence becomes stale or unreliable.

See the complete sampling and scoring method